Article Text

This article has a correction. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
Effective management of acute faecal incontinence in hospital: review of continence management systems
  1. Karen Ousey,
  2. Warren Gillibrand,
  3. Steve Lui
  1. Department of Nursing and Health Studies, Centre for Health and Social Care, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, Yorkshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr K Ousey, Department of Nursing and Health Studies, Centre for Health and Social Care, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, Yorkshire HD1 3DH, UK; k.j.ousey{at}hud.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper reviews the scientific literature regarding current systems available for the management of acute faecal incontinence (FI) in hospital patients. The review searched Medline from 1950 to October 2009 using the adapted search strategy, as devised by the Cochrane Incontinence Group, in order to identify studies relevant to this review, yielding 197 records. Ten studies fitted the inclusion criteria with none of the studies being randomised control trials. Characteristics identified from the studies included: duration of the management devices, cost implications, length of patient stay, contraindications and patient assessment. The management of acute FI in acute settings is a relatively ignored problem, with little available evidence to support a standardised approach to its management. The review highlights the need for early identification of contraindications when FI management systems are being used, particularly in patients administered antithrombotic drugs such as aspirin.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding This work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from ConvaTec.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Miscellanea
    BMJ Publishing Group Ltd