Article Text

PDF
Research
Do critically ill liver patients experience negative bias? A web-based survey examining doctors opinions to critical care escalation
  1. Philip A Berry1,
  2. Marcus Peck2,
  3. Tom Standley4,
  4. Sam J Thomson3
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
  2. 2Intensive Care Unit, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Camberley, UK
  3. 3Department of Gastroenterology, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
  4. 4Intensive Care Unit, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Philip A Berry, Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Frimley Heath NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, Surrey GU16 7UJ, UK; philaberry{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that there is negative bias towards escalating levels of care in decompensated cirrhosis, compared with other patient groups.

Design An electronic survey containing eight acute clinical scenarios with equivalent physiological derangement, in which respondents were asked to score the degree to which they would advocate for intensive care unit admission on a scale of 1–10. Scenarios included respiratory, haematology, vascular, renal, gastrointestinal, postoperative and hepatological conditions. Follow-up questions examined the reasons why the patient should or should not be transferred, and enquired about ceilings of care, end-of-life decisions, degree of organ support and healthcare financial rationing. 273 doctors responded.

Setting Secondary care hospitals in south of England.

Patients None involved.

Interventions None.

Main outcome measures Advocacy score (1–10) and subsidiary responses.

Results The hepatology patient ranked 4th of 8 with a mean advocacy score of 7.2. There were no significant differences between intensivists and physicians or between grades of seniority. Of those less likely to escalate (score 1–5, n=42), the reasons given were based on unsurvivability or excessive burden of treatment rather than aetiology. One-fifth cited ‘lifestyle decision’. 25 (62.5%) respondents not favouring escalation would make the patient DNACPR, 17 (42.5%) would stipulate ward-based care only and a small minority would instigate active palliation. Of those favouring escalation (advocacy score 6–10), 70% (n=122) would consider unlimited organ support. Fifty-four (29.5% of those who answered) said they ‘sometimes’ or ‘frequently’ consider resource allocation when making decisions about escalation of care.

Conclusions When compared with a variety of acute medical scenarios, doctors did not overly appear to exhibit therapeutic nihilism for patients with decompensated liver disease; however, significant variation in interpretation of the data and management approaches was identified.

  • ALCOHOLIC LIVER DISEASE
  • CIRRHOSIS
  • LIVER FAILURE
  • MEDICAL DECISION ANALYSIS

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.