Table 4

Performance data

ERCP difficultyIntentPapilla (n)Success (%)Partial success* (%)Failure (%)
AllCBD cannulationAll (1317)94.1 (84.2–97.2)0.6 (0–1.8)5.6 (2.3–15.5)
Virgin (602)87.0 (79.2–95.5)1.4 (0–4.0)10.7 (3.2–20.2)
Sphincterotomy (713)98.4 (90.5–100)01.6 (0–9.5)
Previous failure (266)86.7 (65.4–96.2)0 (0–3.4)13.3 (3.2–34.6)
No previous failure (733)96.2 (89.8–99.2)0 (0–1.0)3.6 (0.8–10.2)
Sphincterotomyn=377100 (98.2–100)00 (0–1.8)
Stentingn=80897.8 (90.2–98.5)1.0 (0–4.6)2.1 (0–5.2)
Stone extractionn=29686.8 (74.1–89.6)6.6 (0–14.8)8.3 (6.3–11.1)
1CBD cannulationn=89291.9 (85.0–96.0)0.7 (0–1.8)7.0 (3.2–14.7)
Sphincterotomyn=25410000
Stentingn=49897.4 (91.2–100)0 (0–5.4)2.6 (0–4.9)
Stone extractionn=20191.3 (83.9–100)0 (0–8.9)5.7 (0–13.3)
2CBD cannulationn=229100 (90.0–100)0 (0–3.2)0 (0–10.0)
Sphincterotomyn=4610000
Stentingn=16397.0 (90.0–100)0 (0–4.8)0 (0–10.0)
Stone extractionn=5375.0 (50.0–100)16.7 (0–37.5)0 (0–13.3)
3CBD cannulationn=19685.7 (62.5–96.7)0 (0–0.8)14.3 (2.5–37.5)
PD cannulationn=26685.7 (65.7–91.7)0 (0–2.7)14.3 (8.1–34.3)
Spincterotomyn=76100 (83.3–100)00 (0–16.7)
Stentingn=14795.7 (81.3–100)0 (0–4.5)1.3 (0–18.8)
Stone extractionn=4275.0 (50.0–100)12.5 (0–25.0)4.5 (0–25.0)
  • *Partial success regarding cannulation was defined as passage of contrast fluid or successful cannulation with a guidewire, but cannulation with the catheter was not achieved.

  • CBD, common bile duct; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PD, pancreatic duct.