Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence from other professions suggests that training in teamwork and general cognitive abilities, collectively described as non-technical skills, may reduce accidents and errors. The relationship between non-technical teamwork skills and technical errors was studied using a behavioural marker system validated in aviation and adapted for use in surgery.

Method

26 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies were observed. Simultaneous assessments were made of surgical technical errors, by observation clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) task analysis, and non-technical performance, using the surgical NOTECHS behavioural marker system. NOTECHS assesses four categories: (1) leadership and management, (2) teamwork cooperation, (3) problem-solving and decision-making, (4) situation awareness. Each subteam (nurses, surgeons and anaesthetists) was scored separately on each of the four dimensions. Two observers – one surgical trainee and one human factors expert – were used to assess intra-rater reliability.

Results

The mean NOTECHS team score was 35.5 (95% C.I. ± 1.88). The mean subteam scores for surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses were 13.3 (95% C.I. ± 0.64), 11.4 (95% C.I. ± 1.05), and 10.8 (95% C.I. ± 0.87), respectively, with a significant difference between surgeons and anaesthetists (U = 197, p = 0.009), and surgeons and nurses (U = 0.134, p ≤ 0.001). Inter-rater reliability was found to be strong (α = 0.88). There were between zero and six technical errors per operation, with a mean of 2.62 (95% C.I. ± 0.55), which were negatively correlated with the surgeons situational awareness scores (ρ = –0.718, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Non-technical skills are an important component of surgical skill, particularly in relation to the development and maintenance of a surgeon’s situational awareness. Experience from other industries suggests that it may be possible to improve the ability of surgeons to manage their own situation awareness, through training, intraoperative briefings and intraoperative workload management. In the future, it may be possible to use non-technical performance as a surrogate measure for technical performance, either for early identification of surgical difficulties, or as a method of evaluation by which non-surgically trained observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M (2001) Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ 322: 517–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Hebert L, Localio AR, Lawthers AG, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt HH (2004) Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hopsitalised patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. Qual Saf Health Care 13:145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Healey MA, Shackford SR, Osler TM (2002) Complications in surgical patients. Arch Surg 137:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Helmreich RL, Foushee HC (1993) Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors in aviation. In: Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich RL Cockpit Resource Management

  5. McCulloch P (2006) Surgical professionalism in the 21st century. Lancet 367:177–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carthey J, DeLeval M, Reason JT (2003) The Human Factor in Cardiac Surgery: Errors and near misses in a high technology medical domain. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calland JF, Guerlain S, Adams RB (2002) A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 6:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Flin N, Maran N (2004) Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Qual Saf Health Care 13S1:180–184

    Google Scholar 

  9. Catchpole K, Giddings AEB, de Leval M, Gallivan S, Godden P, Utley M, Dale T, Hirst G (2005) Identifying and reducing systems failures through non-technical Skills. Surgeon 3: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Catchpole K, Giddings AEB, de Leval MR, Peek G, Godden PJ, Utley M, Gallivan S, Hirst G, Dale T (2006) Identification of systems failures in uccessful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics (in press)

  11. Bittner R (2004) The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by observational clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139:1215–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cushieri A (1998) Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery: a human reliability analysis. Appl Ergon 29:409–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Flin R, Goeters K-M, Hormann HJ, Martin L (1998) A generic structure of non-technical skills for training and assessment. Paper presented at 23 rd conference of the European Association for aviation psychology, Vienna

  15. Pernerger TV (1998) What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 316: 1236–1238

    Google Scholar 

  16. Endsley M (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors 37:32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Department of Psychology, Georgetown University. Research methods and statistics records: validity and reliability. Available at: http://www.georgetown.edu/departments/psychology/researchmethods/researchanddesign/validityandreliability.htm, accessed: 17th October 2006.

  18. Salmon P, Stanton N, Walker G, Green D (2006) Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. Appl Ergon 37: 225–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fletcher G, Flin R, McGeorge P, Glavin R, Maran N, Patey R (2003) Anaesthetists’ non-technical skills (ANTS): evaluation of a behavioural marker system. Br J Anaest 90: 580–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Endlsey MR, Selcon SJ, Hardiman TD, Croft DG (1998) A comparative analysis of SAGAT and SART for evaluations of situation awareness. Paper presented at 42 nd annual meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Chicago

  21. Lingard L, Reznick R, Espin S, Regehr G, DeVito I (2002) Team Communications in the Operating Room: Talk Patterns, Sites of Tension, and Implications for Novices. Acad Med 77: 232–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Guerlain S, Adams RB, Turrentine FB, Shin T, Guo H, Collins SR, Calland JF (2005) Assessing team performance in the operating room: development and use of a “black box” recorder and other tools for the intraoperative environment. J Am Coll Surg 200: 29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49: 589–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Frankel AS, Leonard MW, Denham CR (2006) Fair and Just Culture, Team Behavior, and Leadership Engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability. HSR: Health Services Res 41: 1690–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke NJ, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA, Stout R (2000) Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors 42: 151–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our thanks to the patients for allowing us to involve them in our studies and the staff participants who allowed us to observe them at work.

Funding

This research was funded by the BUPA foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mishra, A., Catchpole, K., Dale, T. et al. The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22, 68–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9346-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9346-1

Keywords

Navigation