Skip to main content
Log in

A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A unique endoscopic platform with two independent end-effectors, each with five degrees of freedom, and an ergonomic user interface has been developed to address the needs of complex endolumenal and natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures. This study aimed to measure the amount this new platform would improve performance for bimanual coordination compared with a standard dual-channel scope using a benchtop simulation.

Methods

Task 1 involved 12 individuals performing an identical bimanual coordination task with two different devices: a dual-channel endoscope (DCE) and the EndoSAMURAI prototype. The participants were separated into three groups with different levels of endoscopy and NOTES experience. A complex bimanual coordination task (pin transfer) was used. For this task, 12 pins had to be manipulated in a predetermined order. Performance was measured by movement speed, and accuracy. Comparisons were made between the two devices and the three groups of subjects. Task 2 required the same 12 participants to perform a standardized intracorporeal suture in a NOTES simulation.

Results

In the pin transfer task, overall performance speed was significantly faster using the EndoSAMURAI (304 ± 125 s) rather than the DCE (867 ± 312 s; P < 0.001). The difference between the two operating systems was more pronounced in the student group than in the surgeon group: experts (226 ± 41 vs. 620 ± 277 s), surgeons (333 ± 152 vs. 930 ± 283 s), students (318 ± 83 vs. 1021 ± 423 s). Accuracy, as indicated by the number of pin drops, also was significantly better using the EndoSAMURAI (0.4) rather than the DCE (1.8 drops; P = 0.006). In addition, all 12 participants were able to complete a suture using the EndoSAMURAI, but none could complete a suture using the DCE.

Conclusions

The EndoSAMURAI enhances performance times and accuracy in complex surgical tasks compared with the conventional therapeutic endoscope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 826–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bessler M, Stevens PD, Milone L, Hogle NJ, Durak E, Fowler D (2008) Transvaginal laparoscopic cholecystectomy: laparoscopically assisted. Surg Endosc 6:6

    Google Scholar 

  3. Swanstrom LL (2008) IRB requirements for human NOTES procedures. SAGES, Philadelphia, PA

  4. Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G, Lacerda Oliveira A (2007) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 14:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zorron R (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: comparative clinical study with laparoscopy. Digestive Disease Week 2008, San Diego

  6. Mintz Y, Horgan S, Cullen J et al (2007) NOTES: the hybrid technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:402–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl JP, Marks JM, Ponsky JL (2008) Hybrid surgery: combined laparoscopy and natural orifice surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 18:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGee MF, Schomisch SJ, Marks JM et al (2008) Late phase TNF-alpha depression in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy. Surgery 143:318–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee KW, Poon CM, Leung KF, Lee DW, Ko CW (2005) Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J 11:30–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Romanelli JR, Mark L, Omotosho PA (2008) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report. Surg Innov 15:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cuesta MA, Berends F, Veenhof AA (2007) The “invisible cholecystectomy”: a transumbilical laparoscopic operation without a scar. Surg Endosc 18:18

    Google Scholar 

  12. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (2006) White paper October 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 63:199–203

  13. Rao GV, Reddy DN, Banerjee R (2008) NOTES: human experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 18:361–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Spaun GO, Swanstrom LL (2008) Quo vadis NOTES. Eur Surg 40:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thele F, Zygmunt M, Glitsch A, Heidecke CD, Schreiber A (2008) How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery? Endoscopy 40:576–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 9:9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tsin DA, Colombero LT, Lambeck J, Manolas P (2007) Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery. JSLS 11:24–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reardon PR, Kamelgard JI, Applebaum B, Rossman L, Brunicardi FC (1999) Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with miniaturized instrumentation in 50 consecutive cases. World J Surg 23:128–131 discussion 131–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21:1870–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Whiteford MH, Spaun GO (2008) A colorectal surgeons viewpoint on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Minerva Chir 63:385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehman AC, Dumpert J, Wood NA et al (2008) Natural orifice cholecystectomy using a miniature robot. Surg Endosc 23(2):260-266

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oleynikov D (2008) Robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 88:1121–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Spaun GO, Zheng B, Martinec D, Cassera MV, Dunst CM, Swanstrom LL (2009) Bimanual coordination in NOTES: comparing conventional dual-channel endoscope, the R-scope, and a novel direct drive system. Gastrointest Endosc (in press)

  24. Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al (2007) Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 39:761–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Swanstrom L, Zheng B (2008) Spatial orientation and off-axis challenges for NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 18:315–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported in part by a 2007 research grant from NOSCAR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg O. Spaun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spaun, G.O., Zheng, B. & Swanström, L.L. A multitasking platform for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): a benchtop comparison of a new device for flexible endoscopic surgery and a standard dual-channel endoscope. Surg Endosc 23, 2720–2727 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0476-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0476-5

Keywords

Navigation