Elsevier

Cancer Epidemiology

Volume 41, April 2016, Pages 34-41
Cancer Epidemiology

Post-sampling mortality and non-response patterns in the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey: Implications for epidemiological studies based on surveys of cancer patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.010Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • In the context of an English national cancer patient survey we examined predictors of post-sampling mortality or non-response.

  • Patients with certain poor prognosis cancers and older patients were substantially more likely to die before survey mail out.

  • Response rate was overall high, but was substantially lower in younger, poorer and ethnic minority patients.

  • Generalisability limitations need to be acknowledged when analysing and interpreting findings from cancer patient surveys.

  • High response rates and short intervals to mail-out can limit concerns about the generalisability of cancer patient survey.

Abstract

Background

Surveys of the experience of cancer patients are increasingly being introduced in different countries and used in cancer epidemiology research. Sampling processes, post-sampling mortality and survey non-response can influence the representativeness of cancer patient surveys.

Methods

We examined predictors of post-sampling mortality and non-response among patients initially included in the sampling frame of the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey. We also compared the respondents’ diagnostic case-mix to other relevant populations of cancer patients, including incident and prevalent cases.

Results

Of 109,477 initially sampled cancer patients, 6273 (5.7%) died between sampling and survey mail-out. Older age and diagnosis of brain, lung and pancreatic cancer were associated with higher risk of post-sampling mortality. The overall response rate was 67% (67,713 respondents), being >70% for the most affluent patients and those diagnosed with colon or breast cancer and <50% for Asian or Black patients, those under 35 and those diagnosed with brain cancer. The diagnostic case-mix of respondents varied substantially from incident or prevalent cancer cases.

Conclusions

Respondents to the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey represent a population of recently treated cancer survivors. Although patient survey data can provide unique insights for improving cancer care quality, features of survey populations need to be acknowledged when analysing and interpreting findings from studies using such data.

Keywords

Patient
Survey
Non-response
Mortality
Cancer
Disparities

Cited by (0)