Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
We applaud Verma and Chilton1 for publishing their survey on diathermy use for polypectomy which provides evidence of variation in UK practice. On behalf of Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG),2 the UK quality assurance body for endoscopy, we wish to share our proposals of future workstreams pertinent to diathermy.
Patient safety should be at the forefront of endoscopy practice. Diathermy is a modality which, if delivered inappropriately, has the potential for serious harm. It is recognised that both efficacy and safety of polypectomy vary between endoscopists.3 4 Although such heterogeneity may be explained by individual approaches to polypectomy,5 insights specific to diathermy are now elucidated in this survey. The accruing evidence supports the need for greater standardisation of training in polypectomy and diathermy …
Contributors KS: drafted the initial manuscript. AM, PD, GVS and ST-G: refined the content, ensured the integrity of the document in relation to JAG’s views and approved the final version.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests All authors are affiliated with the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG). KS and PD are members of the JAG and National Endoscopy Database committee, AM is leading the national review of colonoscopy and polypectomy certification, GVS is chair of the JAG quality Assurance of training working group and ST-G is the chair of JAG.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.