Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Inside view
Severe emesis and acholic stools in a 70-year-old man
  1. Frédérique St-Pierre1,
  2. Priya Vijayvargiya2,
  3. Rosalind F Sharain3
  1. 1 Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medicine, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  3. 3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Frédérique St-Pierre, Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN 55905-0002, USA; st-pierre.frederique{at}mayo.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

A 70-year-old man with an unremarkable medical history presented to the emergency department with a 2-week history of dark urine, pale stools and diffuse abdominal discomfort. He could not tolerate any oral intake secondary to significant emesis within 1–2 hours of eating. He endorsed a 5 kg weight loss since onset of symptoms. The patient was clinically jaundiced, and abdominal examination was normal. Blood tests showed elevated aspartate aminotransferase 88 U/L, alanine aminotransferase 238 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 396 U/L, total bilirubin 339 µmol/L, direct bilirubin 311 µmol/L and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 295 U/mL. After intravenous hydration, he underwent abdominal ultrasound, which showed pancreatic and intrahepatic biliary duct dilation with no visible stone. Abdominal CT is shown in figure 1. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy noted duodenal stenosis from the apex of the bulb through …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors FS-P: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript. PV: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RFS: material support, revision of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.