Article Text

Download PDFPDF
OC32 Real-world Scottish experience of anti-TNF therapy in paediatric crohn’s disease 2016–2020 against the ECCO-ESPGHAN recommendations
  1. G Scott1,
  2. D Wands2,
  3. DC Wilson2,
  4. R Hansen1,
  5. I Chalmers3
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
  2. 2Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK
  3. 3Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Royal Aberdeen Children’s Hospital, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZG, UK

Abstract

ECCO-ESPGHAN updated the guideline on the management of paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) in 2021. This promoted a move to early risk stratification and a ‘top-down’ (anti-TNF within 4 weeks of diagnosis) approach for patients who were deemed high-risk. High-risk was defined by extensive panenteric or severe disease, perianal, stricturing and/or penetrating behaviour. We sought to compare the use of anti-TNF therapy against the new guidance by conducting a Scottish nationwide retrospective multi-centre study (all three regional PGHAN units).

We analysed a prospectively identified nationwide cohort of all new paediatric CD patients (<18 years) diagnosed in Scotland between 01/01/16 and 31/12/20. We retrospectively collected data from electronic medical records on the use of anti-TNF therapy (infliximab or adalimumab) within 18 months of diagnosis. Paris location and behaviour at diagnosis were determined, allowing us to split the patient group into high-risk or low/medium-risk as per latest ECCO-ESPGHAN guidance. Data regarding surgical intervention was collected and defined as: Perianal (Seton suture or drainage of abscess) and/or bowel resection ± stoma formation.

419 patients were included (259/419 male; median age at diagnosis 13.2 yrs). Disease phenotype is shown in table 1. 225/419 (54%) were classified as high-risk and 194/419 (46%) as low/medium-risk. 171/225 (76%) high-risk and 78/194 (40%) low/medium-risk patients received anti-TNF within 18 months of diagnosis, with median start at 5 months (IQR: 1- 8 m) and 6.5 months (IQR: 3 – 13 m) respectively. 49/171 (40%) high-risk and 12/78 (15.3%) low-risk received anti-TNF within 4 weeks of diagnosis. High-risk patients were more likely to receive anti-TNF (76.0% vs 40.2%, p<0.0001). 37 (8.8%) patients underwent surgical intervention; 31/225 (13.7%) high-risk and 6/194 (3.1%) low/medium-risk (13.7% vs 3.1%, p= 0.0002).

The ECCO-ESPGHAN guidance seeks to shift practice towards “top-down” anti-TNF therapy in high-risk patients. Our real-world data supports this view by showing that high-risk patients are more likely to require biologics within 18 months and more likely to require surgery than low/medium-risk patients. The ECCO-ESPGHAN approach would however have led to unnecessary anti-TNF in 24% of our high-risk cohort within 18 months of diagnosis. The financial cost and risk:benefit profile of this group should be considered carefully both in clinical practice and future guidance.

Abstract OC32 Table 1

Paris classification disease location

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.