Article Text

Download PDFPDF

UpFront
Free
  1. R Mark Beattie
  1. Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor R Mark Beattie; Mark.beattie{at}uhs.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Therapeutic options for children and young people with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

There are ever-increasing therapeutic options for patients with ulcerative colitis, but licensing and availability for children and young people are often years behind those aged >18 years. In this issue, Ashton and colleagues review the evidence. This includes a comprehensive discussion of the standard ‘advanced’ therapies—infliximab and adalimumab. The authors review the ‘newer’ therapies including vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinab and upadacitinab where the evidence is (mostly) from adults with increasing use in patients <age 18 years. The authors discuss the mechanism of action, efficacy and potential toxicity of the different treatments including discussions about what to use when and how long to persist with. There are, of course, many unanswered questions and more research is needed. (See page 387)

Effect of combined rapid access point-of-care intestinal ultrasound clinic on the management of inflammatory bowel disease

There is increasing interest in the use of ultrasound in the assessment and management of inflammatory bowel disease. In this issue, Grunshaw and colleagues report their assessment of the use of point-of-care intestinal ultrasound in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)—277 examinations, 168 patients most scanned and reported within 2 weeks of referral. Of note, 101/227 (44%) had evidence of significant active/obstructing disease, and in patients with known IBD, this rises to 101/185 (55%). Overall, 59.5% (135) of ultrasound examinations resulted in management changes. The paper leaves us with several things to consider—the place of ultrasound in the diagnostic and treatment pathway, resources and training. Certainly linking with our radiology colleagues to develop a national training scheme would allow more widespread uptake. (See page 373)

Real-world clinical effectiveness of ustekinumab in the treatment of Crohn’s disease in the East Midlands UK

In this issue, White and colleagues report their ‘real world’ experience of ustkinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease or IBD unclassified (2016–2020, multiple sites). The primary outcome was steroid-free remission at 12/12. Data is retrospective. Most patients had had previous biologics. In the cases where data was available (see the full paper) corticosteroid-free remission was 41% (68/166) at week 16, 41% (47/115) at week 30 and 48% (38/80) at week 52. Patients who had achieved clinical remission at week 16 were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-free remission at week 52 in keeping with the product licence. The authors highlight the data set as confirming ‘real world’ experience in a large cohort but also agree that more work is needed to decide on case selection and the precise treatment plan. (See page 359)

Antimicrobial treatment for human intestinal spirochaetosis: a systematic review

Intestinal spirochaetosis can cause significant morbidity and clinical guidelines are limited by a paucity of treatment studies. In this issue, Lam and colleagues report their systematic review highlighting the available data on antimicrobial treatment and outcome. 58 studies were included after systematic searching of the relevant databases—42 case reports, 12 case series, 3 cross-sectional studies and 1 prospective cohort, 270 individuals. Metronidazole (mostly), doxycycline and parenteral penicillin were the most frequently used antimicrobials and the treatment response was generally good (85%). The reported evidence however is generally heterogenous in type and would be classified as low quality. The authors rightly suggest more research is needed to understand the pathophysiology and better inform treatment guidance for patients with symptomatic infection. (See page 408)

Giardia duodenalis in men who have sex with men: a systematic review

Outbreaks of G. duodenalis enteritis have been described in the sexual networks of men who have sex with men (MSM). In this issue, Dubey and colleagues report a systematic review to explore risk factors. 12 manuscripts were selected after systematic searching of the relevant databases, 191 patients with G. duodenalis. Multiple demographic, behavioural and biological factors were associated. These are summarised in the paper. The review highlights some potential target risk factors and populations for interventions to reach and optimise G. duodenalis control in MSM. The review also highlights the importance of comprehensive sexually transmitted infection, HIV and hepatitis testing in MSM with G. duodenalis. (See page 417)

Improving endoscopy unit efficacy and retention through the provision of role-specific admin and clerical training

We are all dependant on robust administrative and clerical support to do our jobs well. In this issue, Dawson and colleagues report on the development and implementation of core admin and clerical (A&C) skills in endoscopy course for (A&C) staff. The article explores the aims and methodology, competency framework (see figure 1), practicalities of delivery and present preliminary evaluation data plus future recommendations. There is no doubt the initiative had a positive impact and I am sure we would all agree that paying attention to the training needs and professional development of the team around us will result in improved teamwork, increased resilience and improved outcomes (See page 424)

And finally

It has been a real privilege to be the Editor in Chief of Frontline Gastroenterology for the last 6 years. I step down this month. I have enjoyed watching the journal develop and publish high-impact content to help clinicians in their practice. It is great that the journal is now six editions a year. It is great we now have an impact factor. I am indebted to many people. I have been so well supported by the fantastic editorial team, BMJ and BSG and am ever grateful to them for their hard work, commitment and enthusiastic support. I am so grateful to the authors for their submissions and reviewers for their time and expertise. I am most grateful to the readers who continue to read, like and promote the content. I would like to congratulate Dr Phillip Smith who will take over as Editor in Chief. I wish him all the best. I know he will be excellent.

Please enjoy this issue. Please continue to read, enjoy and provide feedback on the journal. Follow us on Twitter @FrontGastro_BMJ, join the #FGDebate and listen to our regular podcasts accessed via the journal website https://fg.bmj.com/

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.