Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Improving triage in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: insights from the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED)
  1. David Beaton1,2,
  2. Linda Sharp3,
  3. Nigel John Trudgill4,
  4. Matt Rutter2,5
  1. 1 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
  2. 2 Newcastle University School of Population and Health Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  3. 3 Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University School of Population and Health Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  4. 4 Gastroenterology, Sandwell General Hospital, West Bromwich, UK
  5. 5 Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr David Beaton; dbeaton1{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Background and aims We aimed to analyse data from the UK National Endoscopy Database (NED) to investigate factors associated with endotherapy in patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) .

Methods Analysis of oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) uploads to the NED from 1 March 2019 to 29 February 2020 was performed. UGIB was defined as procedures with indications of melaena and/or haematemesis. The proportion where endotherapy was performed was calculated. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed with patient sex, patient age, type of admission (inpatient, outpatient, unclassified) and symptoms as fixed effects on the dependent variable (receipt of endotherapy). Results were presented as adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs.

Results 47 481 OGDs were performed for UGIB; endotherapy was performed in 14.8%, increasing to 20.0% when only inpatient OGDs were analysed. Patients aged 18–39 years were half as likely to undergo endotherapy than those aged 50–59 years (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.6), with male patients at higher risk than females (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4).

Patients with both melaena and haematemesis were nearly three times more likely to receive endotherapy (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.6 to 3.0) compared with those with melaena alone. Conversely, patients with only haematemesis had a lower risk than those with melaena alone (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.8 to 0.9).

Conclusions Younger and female patients were at lower risk of undergoing endotherapy, while patients with both melaena and haematemesis were at three times the risk as those with each symptom alone. Incorporating these findings into UGIB risk scores could improve patient triage.

  • gastrointestinal bleeding
  • gastrointestinal haemorrhage
  • diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy
  • bleeding peptic ulcer
  • bleeding

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • X @Rutter_Matt

  • Contributors DB, LS and MR designed the study, drafted and revised the manuscript, with input from NJT. DB analysed the data and acts as guarantor for the work and conduct of the study. All authors approved the manuscript for submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/. LS has unrestricted project grants from 3D-Matrix and Medtronic. All other authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Highlights from this issue
    Philip J Smith