Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pouch dysfunction: don't forget the surgeons!
  1. David N Naumann1,
  2. Sian Abbott1,
  3. Diane Hall2,
  4. Douglas M Bowley1
  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to David N Naumann, Department of General Surgery, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK;

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read the article ‘Pouchitis: a practical guide’1 with great interest, and support the authors’ efforts to simplify the management of patients with ileal pouch dysfunction. In particular, we agree that a diagnosis of pouchitis must not be presumptive, but should be made based on clinical, histological and endoscopic findings, and that pouch complications are best defined as a deviation from normal pouch function. Although their well considered algorithm is comprehensive from a gastroenterologist's perspective, Steinhart and Ben-Bassat1 have rather skated over crucial elements that inform a surgeon's practice. Although pouchitis is the most common long-term complication of ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA), there are several ‘surgical’ entities that have similar presenting symptoms and signs, such as pelvic sepsis, fistulae, abscesses, strictures, sinuses and cuffitis. The timely diagnosis and treatment of these …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.