Article Text

Review
Implementation of an endoscopy safety checklist
  1. M Matharoo1,2,
  2. S Thomas-Gibson1,2,
  3. A Haycock1,2,
  4. N Sevdalis2
  1. 1The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
  2. 2Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Manmeet Matharoo, The Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK; m.matharoo{at}imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

Patient safety and quality improvement are increasingly prioritised across all areas of healthcare. Errors in endoscopy are common but often inconsequential and therefore go uncorrected. A series of minor errors, however, may culminate in a significant adverse event. This is unsurprising given the rising volume and complexity of cases coupled with shift working patterns. There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that surgical safety checklists can prevent errors and thus positively impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Consequently, surgical checklists are mandatory for all procedures. Many UK hospitals are mandating the use of similar checklists for endoscopy. There is no guidance on how best to implement endoscopy checklists nor any measure of their usefulness in endoscopy. This article outlines lessons learnt from innovating service delivery in our unit.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement: