Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The new treatment paradigm for Barrett's dysplasia
  1. Laurence Lovat
  1. Correspondence to Professor Laurence Lovat, Department for Tissue & Energy, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, UCL, UCLH, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EJ, UK; l.lovat{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

You are diagnosed with localised cancer. What are your options? A small cancer can be entirely removed with surgery. If it is larger, after debulking, the tumour field is ablated using radiotherapy.

So what happens if you have precancerous change such as mucosal dysplasia arising in Barrett’s oesophagus? It should be easily curable. But sadly, until very recently, there was no local treatment. The doctor could offer regular endoscopic surveillance until cancer developed or perform oesophagectomy with its 30% morbidity rate and not insignificant mortality rate. Finally, the paradigm is changing.

The standard cancer treatment approach can be applied to Barrett's dysplasia. Debulking using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) followed by field ablation using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has completely revolutionised treatment. Therapy is now performed as a day case and usually requires between two and three sessions spaced 2–3 months apart. There have been two randomised controlled trials (RCTs): one for both low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and the second for LGD only. The first showed …

View Full Text


  • Commentary for Frontline Gastroenterology on the article submitted by Ortiz et al, February 2015

  • Twitter Follow Laurence B. Lovat at @barrettsonline

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it was published Online First. The provenance and peer review statement has been corrected.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles