Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Systematic review
Guide to managing persistent upper gastrointestinal symptoms during and after treatment for cancer
  1. H Jervoise N Andreyev1,
  2. Ann C Muls1,
  3. Clare Shaw1,
  4. Richard R Jackson1,
  5. Caroline Gee1,
  6. Susan Vyoral1,
  7. Andrew R Davies2
  1. 1The GI and Nutrition Team, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, UK
  2. 2Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr H J N Andreyev, The GI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Rd, London SW3 6JJ, UK; j{at}andreyev.demon.co.uk

Abstract

Background Guidance: the practical management of the gastrointestinal symptoms of pelvic radiation disease was published in 2014 for a multidisciplinary audience. Following this, a companion guide to managing upper gastrointestinal (GI) consequences was developed.

Aims The development and peer review of an algorithm which could be accessible to all types of clinicians working with patients experiencing upper GI symptoms following cancer treatment.

Methods Experts who manage patients with upper GI symptoms were asked to review the guide, rating each section for agreement with the recommended measures and suggesting amendments if necessary. Specific comments were discussed and incorporated as appropriate, and this process was repeated for a second round of review.

Results 21 gastroenterologists, 11 upper GI surgeons, 9 specialist dietitians, 8 clinical nurse specialists, 5 clinical oncologists, 3 medical oncologists and 4 others participated in the review. Consensus (defined prospectively as 60% or more panellists selecting ‘strongly agree’ or ‘agree’) was reached for all of the original 31 sections in the guide, with a median of 90%. 85% of panellists agreed that the guide was acceptable for publication or acceptable with minor revisions. 56 of the original 61 panellists participated in round 2. 93% agreed it was acceptable for publication after the first revision. Further minor amendments were made in response to round 2.

Conclusions Feedback from the panel of experts developed the guide with improvement of occasional algorithmic steps, a more user-friendly layout, clearer time frames for referral to other teams and addition of procedures to the appendix.

  • OESOPHAGEAL CANCER
  • GASTRIC CANCER
  • PANCREATIC CANCER
  • QUALITY OF LIFE

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the study design. Algorithm development was performed by HJNA, ACM and ARD. Guarantor of the article HJNA.

  • Funding National Institute for Health Research and the Royal Marsden Biomedical Research Centre. Some of the work in compiling this guide was facilitated by funding received from Macmillan Cancer Support.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.