Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Inside view
Mass in a fatty liver
  1. Dirk J van der Windt1,
  2. Gregory C Wilson1,
  3. Ioannis A Ziogas1,
  4. Samer Tohme1,
  5. Alessandro Furlan2,
  6. Michael A Nalesnik3,
  7. David A Geller1
  1. 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2 Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3 Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dirk J van der Windt, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Liver Cancer Center, UPMC Montefiore 7 South, 3459 Fifth Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; vanderwindtd{at}upmc.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

A 39-year-old man was referred to our clinic for liver diseases for a liver mass incidentally found on CT done to rule out kidney stones (figure 1A). In our clinic, he was asymptomatic with regular bowel habits. He denied episodes of jaundice, did not have skin tattoos, never smoked or used illicit drugs and rarely consumed alcohol. His lifestyle was sedentary, and his diet consisted predominantly of fast food. His medical history included arterial hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Several years prior, he had undergone a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. His obese abdomen (body mass index 36 kg/m2) was non-tender to palpation. On laboratory analysis, white blood cell count, haemoglobin, platelet count, bilirubin, liver transaminases and international normalised ratio (INR) were within …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors DJvdW and IAZ wrote the manuscript. GCW, AF and MAN provided the images and interpretation thereof. ST and DAG edited the manuscript. All the authors approved the final article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.