The provision of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) often presents clinicians with ethical dilemmas. As the population grows there is increasing prevalence of patients with conditions such as stroke, dementia, advanced malignancy, cerebral palsy and eating disorders and a greater demand for CANH. It is important that healthcare professionals are familiar with the ethical and legal position for the provision of CANH. In addition, it is important to be aware of the clinical indications, relative contraindications and alternative means of supporting patients for whom CANH is not appropriate; this includes education and training for staff, patients, carers and relatives. The lack of high-quality evidence around clinical outcomes, particularly in the form of randomised clinical trials, and the challenges of accurate prognostication in patients who are approaching the end of life make decisions around the provision of CANH difficult for healthcare professionals.
- artificial nutrition support
- nutrition support
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors AR is the guarantor of the article.
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned, externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.