Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Testing for ammonia: do as I say, not as we do.
  1. Jeremy Louissaint1,
  2. Russell Rosenblatt1,2
  1. 1Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
  2. 2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Russell Rosenblatt, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA; rur9017{at}med.cornell.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Ammonia is key in the development of hepatic encephalopathy. A clear relationship between the degree of hyperammonemia and worsening encephalopathy is well-established in acute liver failure. The utility of ammonia testing in the diagnosis of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), however, has been repeatedly questioned. First, the route (venous or arterial), laboratory and prandial state all contribute to wide variations in ammonia levels.1 Second, the correlation between ammonia levels and stage of OHE is only modest with many patients with ‘normal’ levels presenting with clinically high-grade encephalopathy.2 Lastly, hepatic encephalopathy is a clinical diagnosis dependent on a history and physical examination; as such, ammonia is notably absent from diagnostic and grading algorithms. Therefore, since ammonia levels are often not clinically relevant, its frequent misuse can result in excess healthcare costs. To answer the question of the impact of excessive ammonia ordering, Aby et al explore the prevalence and resulting financial consequences of inappropriate ammonia testing.3

Financial implications of inappropriate testing

In a large multicentre retrospective analysis, the authors longitudinally reviewed the frequency of inappropriate ammonia testing; defined as indications for testing other than for acute liver failure, urea cycle disorder …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @rrosenblattmd

  • Contributors JL is the guarantor of this article. Roles: Concept: JL, RR. Writing: JL, RR. Critical revision: RR.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles