Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Opinion
Investigating for GI malignancy in iron-deficiency anaemia—the case for risk stratification
  1. Jonathon Snook
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jonathon Snook, Department of Gastroenterology, Poole Hospital NHSFT, Longfleet Road, Poole BH11 9NG, UK; jonathon.snook{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a common clinical problem, with an incidence in excess of one case per 1000 of population per annum.1 Large case series2–4 have consistently shown that about 10% of men and postmenopausal women with IDA have underlying gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy, often in the absence of any other clinical pointer to the diagnosis. It is for this reason that IDA is recognised as an urgent indication for GI investigation.5 Tumours responsible for IDA may lie anywhere along the GI tract, though the commonest site is in the proximal colon.

Bidirectional endoscopy (BDE), combines gastroscopy and colonoscopy in the same session, and is an efficient means of assessing the GI tract in IDA.4 ,5 As well as identifying cancer, it may pick up a myriad of less serious GI pathology (eg, coeliac disease, vascular malformations) in a further 20% of cases.2–4 BDE is labour-intensive, however, taking up to an hour to complete for each patient, and carries a small but significant risk of complications, particularly in the elderly and those with …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.