Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
COVID-19-related health anxieties and impact of specific interventions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the UK
  1. Nasir Mir1,
  2. Jonathan Cheesbrough1,
  3. Thomas Troth1,
  4. Nasir Hussain2,
  5. Laurence Joseph Hopkins1,
  6. Jiaqi Shi1,
  7. Najiat Sarker1,
  8. Emma Smith1,
  9. Finula Courtney1,
  10. Jill Flaherty1,
  11. Rebecca Hill2,
  12. Sarah Jebb2,
  13. Villa Kakosa2,
  14. Jason Calderwood1,
  15. Naveen Sharma1,3,
  16. Adam McCulloch2,
  17. Mohammed Nabil Quraishi1,3
  1. 1 Department of Gastroenterology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2 Department of Gastroenterology, Good Hope Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3 Centre for Liver and Gastroenterology Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mohammed Nabil Quraishi, Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK; nabil.quraishi{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Objective Health-related concerns brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact of specific local and national interventions have not been explored in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the UK. We evaluated perspectives of patients with IBD on the pandemic and effectiveness of information dissemination in addressing concerns.

Methods We prospectively conducted a survey among patients with IBD during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess concerns, information-seeking behaviours, risk perception, compliance and effect of specific interventions.

Results A total of 228 patients were interviewed of whom 89% reported being concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their health. Access to at least one IBD-specific clinical interaction during the pandemic (COVID-19 information letter from IBD team, interaction with IBD team or general practitioner, Crohn and Colitis UK website visit) was significantly associated with alleviating concerns (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.35 to 5.24; p=0.005). Seeking health information solely through unofficial channels (search engines or social media) was less likely to ease concerns (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.61; p=0.008). A quarter of patients disagreed with their assigned risk groups, with majority perceiving higher-risk profiles. This discordance was greatest in patients within the moderate-risk group and constituted immunosuppression use. Nearly 40% of patients had ongoing concerns with regard to their medications of whom a third felt their concerns were not addressed.

Conclusion IBD-specific clinical interactions are associated with alleviation of COVID-19 health concerns. These findings have wider implications and emphasise importance of innovative solutions that facilitate effective communication with patients without overburdening current services.

  • IBD clinical
  • IBD

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. Not applicable.

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information. Not applicable.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • NM, JC, TT and NH are joint first authors.

  • NS, AM and MNQ are joint senior authors.

  • Contributors MNQ, NSa and AM conceived the study. All authors (NM, JC, TT, NH, LJH, JS, NSa, EM, FC, JF, RH, SJ, VK, JC, NSh, AM and MNQ) conducted the survey and collated the data. MNQ conducted the analysis. MNQ, AM and NSa interpreted the data. MNQ, AM, NM, JC, TT and NH wrotethe first draft of the manuscript. All authors authors (NM, JC, TT, NH, LJH, JS, NSa, EM, FC, JF, RH, SJ, VK, JC, NSh, AM and MNQ) contributed to interpretation of data and critically reviewing the manuscript. MNQ, AM and NSh finalised the submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.