@article {Ratcliffeflgastro-2020-101734, author = {Elizabeth Ratcliffe and Sharmila Subramaniam and Wee Sing Ngu and Susan McConnell and Ian L P Beales and Raymond McCrudden and Geoff V Smith and Christopher Wells}, title = {Endoscopy training in the UK pre-COVID{\textendash}19 environment: a multidisciplinary survey of endoscopy training and the experience of reciprocal feedback}, elocation-id = {flgastro-2020-101734}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1136/flgastro-2020-101734}, publisher = {British Medical Journal Publishing Group}, abstract = {Objective Training in gastrointestinal endoscopy in the UK occurs predominantly in a real world one-to-one trainer to trainee interaction. Previous surveys have shown surgical and gastroenterology trainees have had mixed experiences of supervision and training, and no surveys have explored specifically the role of trainee to trainer feedback. This study aimed to explore the experience of training and of providing trainer feedback for all disciplines of endoscopy trainees.Design/method An online survey designed in collaboration with Joint Advisory Committee training committee and trainee representatives was distributed from January 2020 but was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic and hence terminated early.Results There were 129 responses, including trainees from all disciplines and regions, of which 86/129 (66.7\%) rated the culture in their endoscopy units favourably{\textemdash}either good or excellent. 65/129 (50.4\%) trainees reported having one or more training lists allocated per week, with 41/129 (31.8\%) reporting only ad hoc lists. 100/129 (77.5\%) respondents were given feedback and 97/129 (75.2\%) were provided with learning points from the list. 65/129 (50.4\%) respondents reported their trainer completed a direct observation of procedure or direct observation of polypectomies. 73/129 (56.6\%) respondents reported that they felt able to give feedback to their trainer, with 88/129 (68.2\%) feeling they could do this accurately. Barriers to trainer feedback cited included time constraints, lack of anonymity and concerns about affecting the trainer{\textendash}trainee relationship.Conclusion Overall, the training environment has improved since previous surveys. There are still issues around interdisciplinary differences with some surgical trainees finding the training environment less welcoming, and trainee perceptions of hierarchical barriers and trainer responsiveness to feedback limiting the accuracy of their feedback.}, issn = {2041-4137}, URL = {https://fg.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/21/flgastro-2020-101734}, eprint = {https://fg.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/21/flgastro-2020-101734.full.pdf}, journal = {Frontline Gastroenterology} }