Skip to main content
Log in

A double-blind comparison of the effectiveness of azathioprine and sulfasalazine in idiopathic proctocolitis

Preliminary report

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The American Journal of Digestive Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A double-blind therapeutic trial of azathioprine in 20 patients with acute proctocolitis was performed over a 3-month period. Azathioprine was compared with sulfasalazine in patients paired and treated in a sequential order. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, biopsy, and radiologic data were assessed by semiquantitative criteria. No significant difference in the effect of the drugs was observed. Both azathioprine and sulfasalazine produce significant improvement in clinical symptoms, some laboratory findings (ESR, serum iron), and endoscopic and biopsy findings (P<0.05). Radiologic improvement was less evident (P<0.10). On the overall final evaluation of the trial, 14 patients were improved, and 6 remained stationary or worsened (P<0.10). This short-term trial confirms previous uncontrolled experiences of one of the authors on larger series of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caprilli R, Badalamenti G, De Santis R: Rilievi su la terapia della proctocolite idiopatica con farmaci immunodepressivi. IlPoliclinico Sez Med 73:349–360, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caprilli R, Torsoli A: Ulcerative colitis 1970. Recent developments. Scand J Gastroenterol (Suppl) 6:63–91, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caprilli R: La terapia immunosoppressiva della colite ulcerosa. Atti XVIII Congr Naz Soc Ital Gastroenterol Siena 201–212, 1971

  4. Cassano C, Torsoli A, Perlmann P: Colite ulcerosa e morbo di Crohn del colon. Problemi di diagnosi e di terapia. Aspetti immunologici. Atti LXXIII Congr Soc Ital Med Intern Roma 1–60, 1972

  5. Bean RHD: Treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis with 6-mercaptopurine. Med J Aust 2:592–593, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bean RHD: Treatment of ulcerative colitis with antimetabolites. Br Med J 1:1081–1084, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bowen GE, Irons GV, Rhodes JB, Kirsner JB: Early experiences with azathioprine in ulcerative colitis. JAMA 195:460–464, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacKay JR, Wall AJ, Goldstein G: Response to azathioprine in ulcerative colitis. Am J Dig Dis 11:536–545, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  9. Theodor E, Gilon E, Wakes U: Treatment of ulcerative colitis with azathioprine. Br Med J 4:741–743, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arden Jones R: Immunosuppressive therapy in ulcerative colitis. Proc R Soc Med 62:449–501, 1969

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patterson JF, Norton RA, Schwartz RS: Azathioprine treatment of ulcerative colitis, granulomatous colitis and regional eneteritis. Am J Dig Dis 16:327–332, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  12. Korelitz BI, Wisch N: Long-term therapy of ulcerative colitis with 6-mercaptopurine: A personal series. Am J Dig Dis 17:111–118, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jewell DP, Truelove SC: Azathioprine in ulcerative colitis: An interim report on a controlled therapeutic trial. Br Med 1:709–712, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenberg JL, Wall AJ, Settles RH, Binder HJ, Levin B, Kirsner JB: A controlled trial of azathioprine in the treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 64:793 A-110, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  15. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG: Statistical methods. Sixth Edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 1967

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caprilli, R., Carratu, R. & Babbini, M. A double-blind comparison of the effectiveness of azathioprine and sulfasalazine in idiopathic proctocolitis. Digest Dis Sci 20, 115–120 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072336

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072336

Keywords

Navigation