Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80072-5

The American Journal of Surgery

Volume 171, Issue 1, January 1996, Pages 47-51

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80072-5 Get rights and content

Background

The role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of various upper and lower gastrointestinal disorders is still under investigation. However, a variety of laparoscopic procedures may be applied in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Patients and methods

We present our initial results of laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted management of IBD in 72 consecutive patients (37 women and 35 men; mean age 36 years, range 20 to 79). The indications for surgery included: terminal ileitis in 29 patients, mucosal ulcerative colitis in 23 patients, Crohn's colitis in 11 patients, severe perianal Crohn's disease in 4 patients, duodenal Crohn's disease in 3 patients, Crohn's rectovaginal fistula in 1 patient, and rectourethral fistula in 1 patient. The procedures performed included: total abdominal colectomy (TAC) in 30 patients (22 with total proctocolectomy with ileoanal reservoir, 6 with TAC with ileorectal anastomosis, and 2 with TAC with end ileostomy), ileocolic resection in 30 patients, diverting loop ileostomy in 6 patients, closure of an end ileostomy as an ileorectal anastomosis in 3 patients who already underwent a TAC with end Ileostomy, and duodenal bypass gastrojejunostomy in 3 patients.

Results

There were 16 complications in 13 (18%) patients: 3 enterotomies, 4 episodes of bleeding, 3 pelvic abscesses, 2 intestinal obstructions, 2 prolonged ileus, 1 anastomotic leak, and 1 efferent loop obstruction after gastrojejunostomy. However, only 3 patients required laparotomy for morbidity, and there was no mortality. In 7 (10%) patients, the laparoscopic procedure was converted to a laparotomy due to a large inflammatory mass with fistula in 4 patients, bleeding in 2 patients, and an enterotomy in 1 patient. The mean operating time was 2.9 hours (range 0.7 to 6) and the mean length of hospital stay was 6.5 days (range 3 to 19). When compared with ileocolic resection, total colectomy was associated with higher morbidity (30% versus 10%, P <0.05) and longer hospitalization (8.7 days [range 4 to 19] versus 5.2 days [range 3 to 7], respectively; P <0.05).

Conclusions

According to this initial experience, laparoscopic surgery is a versatile and effective modality in the surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease in selected patients. However, laparoscopic total colectomy is associated with higher morbidity when compared with ileocolic resection.

References (19)

FalkPM et al.
Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal
Dis Colon Rectum
(1993)
WexnerSD et al.
Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective assessment
Dis Colon Rectum
(1992)
Pfeifer J, Wexner SD, Reissman P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy: cost effectiveness and outcome. Surg...
ReissmanP et al.
Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Surg Endosc.
(1994)
WexnerSD et al.
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a provocative critique
Int Surg.
(1994)
WexnerSD et al.
Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy
Br J Surg.
(1995)
SchmittSL et al.
Does laparoscopic assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalisation?
Int J Colorectal Dis.
(1994)
WexnerSD et al.
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective
Br J Surg.
(1993)
WexnerSD
General principles of surgery in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease
Semin Gastrointest Dis.
(1991)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (150)

Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduces the risk of surgical site infections: An ACS-NSQIP study
2022, Surgery in Practice and Science
Previous literature related to postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is primarily based on small numbers of patients from single institutions. The aim of this study is to evaluate these outcomes in a large number of patients using propensity score matching (PSM).
The ACS-NSQIP Program data files (2016-2019) were reviewed to identify patients who underwent an IPAA creation. The impact of surgical approach on operative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) on all patient characteristics was used to obtain matched groups. Fisher's Exact/Chi-Squared tests were used to compare outcomes between groups. A Bonferroni correction was applied to the outcomes, with a p-value of 0.0031 representing statistical significance.
1802 patients were identified, with 1001 patients in the laparoscopic group and 801 patients in the open group. PSM yielded 702 patients in each matched group. Median operative time was longer for laparoscopic IPAA (278vs218.5 minutes, p<0.001). Laparoscopic IPAA patients were less likely to develop superficial and deep SSIs (3.0% vs 6.6% p=0.003). There were no differences in in-hospital mortality (0.4% vs 0.0%, p=0.3), anastomotic leak (4.0% vs 3.3%, p=1.0), organ-space SSI (6.7% vs 6.0, p=1.0), or reoperation (5.7% vs 4.0%, p=0.2) between groups. Length of stay was lower after laparoscopic IPAA (5.0 vs 6.0 days, p=0.004). There were no differences between groups in other postoperative complications.
These data suggest that when matched for other confounding variables, laparoscopic IPAA is associated with reduced length of stay and superficial/deep SSIs when compared to open IPAA. Other surgical complications, including in-hospital mortality and anastomotic leak, are similar.
Given the recovery benefit of the laparoscopic approach and the reduced SSI, laparoscopy should be the method of choice for the majority of patients undergoing IPAA.
Surgical Management of Crohn's Disease
2022, Gastroenterology Clinics of North America
Citation Excerpt :
Both randomized and nonrandomized studies have demonstrated safety and decreased morbidity and mortality with laparoscopic versus open resection in patients with CD.16–21 Laparoscopic surgery has shown decreased length of stay, shorter time to return of bowel function, decreased cost, improved postoperative complication rate, and decreased small bowel obstructions (35% vs 11%) for small bowel and ileocolonic CD.16–24 Patient selection is again important.
Surgery for Crohn Disease: Personalizing the Operation
2019, Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: 2 Volume Set
Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intestinal tract with an unknown etiology and an unknown cure. The characteristic transmural inflammation can progress to refractory inflammatory disease, stricturing disease, and fistulizing disease—all potential indications for surgery when medical management has been exhausted. An important tenet to remember is that surgery is not curative but is rather an adjunct to maximal medical therapy. Thus bowel preservation is imperative because up to two-thirds of patients will require subsequent operations in their lifetime. This chapter discusses the preoperative considerations, indications for operation, and intraoperative decision making for operating on patients with CD.
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery for diverticular disease is not suitable for the early part of the learning curve. A retrospective cohort study
2013, International Journal of Surgery
Citation Excerpt :
Laparoscopic resection for inflammatory colon pathology is technically more demanding due to the inflammatory reaction and distortion of the normal surgical planes. Complication rates can be high and so, too, the rate of consequent conversions.10 The consequences of this inflammation such as thick mesentery, fibrosis and fistulas can lead to time consuming operations, high conversion rates and post-operative complications.11
We evaluate the challenges of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for diverticular disease.
Retrospective study of elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures (LCP) performed 2002–2011. The study compares LCP for Diverticular disease (S group) with both LCP for other pathology (C1 group) and open procedures for diverticular disease (C2 group). Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, Student “t” test and Mann Whitney U-test.
The study included 194 LCP out of which 22 were in S group. Conversion rate in S group was 27.3% vs 9.9% in C1 group, p = 0.017. The mean operating time was significantly higher in S group (250 min) compared with 196 min in C1 group, p = 0.0004. The median length of hospital stay was 6 days in S group and 4 days in C group, p = 0.12. Both morbidities and mortality rates were not statistically different between the two groups. In the second part of the study we compare LCP with OCP performed for diverticular disease.
LCP for Diverticular disease are technically challenging and should be attempted later in the learning curve.
Restorative Proctocolectomy with J-Pouch Ileoanal Anastomosis
2012, Atlas of Advanced Operative Surgery
Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Crohn Disease
2012, Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract: Volume 1-2, Seventh Edition

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease

Background

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusions

Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal

Dis Colon Rectum

Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective assessment

Dis Colon Rectum

Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Surg Endosc.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a provocative critique

Int Surg.

Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy

Br J Surg.

Does laparoscopic assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalisation?

Int J Colorectal Dis.

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective

Br J Surg.

General principles of surgery in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease

Semin Gastrointest Dis.