Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70212-6Get rights and content

To assess the success rates and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in adult and pediatric patients, the charts of 76 adults and 116 children with endoscopically or radiographically documented esophageal foreign body impaction were retrospectively reviewed. Success rates for rigid esophagoscopy (100%) and flexible endoscopy (96.2%) were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Overall, rigid esophagoscopy had a higher complication rate than flexible endoscopy (10% versus 5.1%, p > 0.05), but this trend did not reach statistical significance. The Foley catheter technique was used predominantly in children with proximally located blunt objects. Our study shows that flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are both safe and effective methods of removing esophageal foreign bodies, but rigid esophagoscopy carries a higher complication rate and therefore should be reserved for patients in whom flexible endoscopy is unsuccessful. The Foley catheter technique is suited only for proximally located blunt objects, and its routine use is not recommended. (Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:626-30.)

References (27)

  • W. Webb

    Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract

    Gastroenterology

    (1988)
  • F.J. Vizcarrondo et al.

    Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1983)
  • M. Classen et al.

    Operative and therapeutic techniques in endoscopy

    Clin Gastroenterol

    (1978)
  • K.M. Ratcliff

    Esophageal foreign bodies

    Am Fam Physician

    (1991)
  • W.S. Crysdale et al.

    Esophageal foreign bodies in children: 15 year review of 484 cases

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1991)
  • D.B. Hawkins

    Removal of blunt foreign bodies from the esophagus

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1990)
  • N. Thompson et al.

    Button battery ingestion: a review

    Adv Drug React Acute Poison

    (1990)
  • M.D. Stringer et al.

    Rationalizing the management of swallowed coins in children

    BMJ

    (1991)
  • P.R. Joseph

    Management of coin ingestion [Letter]

    Am J Dis Child

    (1990)
  • C.M. Myer

    Potential hazards of esophageal foreign body extraction

    Pediatr Radiol

    (1991)
  • S. Suita et al.

    Management of pe- diatric patients who have swallowed foreign objects

    Am Surg

    (1989)
  • G.B. Healy

    Removal of esophageal foreign bodies with a Foley catheter under fluoroscopic control

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1988)
  • A. Chaikhouni et al.

    Foreign bodies of the esophagus

    Am Surg

    (1985)
  • Cited by (121)

    • Foreign bodies and caustic lesions

      2013, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgery is required in about 1% of patients. [2] Severe complications (perforations, obstructions, local or regional infections, massive bleeding, fistula and foreign body migrations through the digestive wall) occur in 1%–5% of patients [2,12,24–26]. Oesophageal perforation is the most feared and most frequent (2%) complication [8].

    • Management and endoscopic techniques for digestive foreign body and food bolus impaction

      2013, Digestive and Liver Disease
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgery is sometimes required (1% in the same series) [2]. Rates of complication after foreign body ingestion varies from 0% to 38% of cases, according to what is considered a complication (such as mucosal erosions in some series) [2,33,42,79–81]. Severe complications (including perforations, obstructions, local or regional infections [62], massive bleeding [11], fistula and foreign body migrations through the digestive wall [82]) are rare (1–5%) [2,33,42,79–81].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text