Gastroenterology

Gastroenterology

Volume 133, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages 675-701
Gastroenterology

AGA Institute
AGA Institute Review of Endoscopic Sedation

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Preprocedure Assessment

An evaluation of the patient should precede the administration of intravenous sedation. This assessment is designed to identify those aspects of a patient’s medical history and physical examination that could adversely affect the outcome of endoscopic sedation. Essential elements of the medical history include the following: (1) significant cardiac or pulmonary disease; (2) neurologic or seizure disorder; (3) stridor, snoring, or sleep apnea; (4) adverse reaction to sedation or anesthesia; (5)

Pharmacology of Sedation

The goal of endoscopic sedation is to maximize patient comfort while minimizing the risk of drug-related side effects. Achieving optimal sedation requires careful consideration of patient and procedure-related variables. Patient factors include age, health status, concurrent medications, preprocedural anxiety, and pain tolerance. The procedural variables include the degree of invasiveness, level of procedure-related discomfort, and the duration of examination. The drugs most widely used for

Patient Monitoring

Patient monitoring is an essential element of endoscopic sedation. The term monitoring includes both visual assessment as well as the use of devices to measure physiologic parameters. A trained observer may recognize subtle alterations in the patient’s condition before objective changes are detected in vital signs and other parameters.

Guidelines for patient monitoring during endoscopic procedures have been developed by several professional medical societies.5, 45, 116 The American Society of

Training Guidelines

The training process should provide the skills necessary to administer endoscopic sedation safely and effectively. This requires the following: (1) an understanding of the pharmacologic principles of the drugs used for sedation and analgesia, (2) an ability to monitor sedated patients, and (3) the resources to manage complications that may occur. In addition to the skill sets listed earlier, the endoscopist should possess a thorough understanding of the preprocedural assessment and be able to

Medicolegal Considerations

Endoscopic sedation is associated with unavoidable clinical risk, separate and apart from that associated with manipulation of the endoscope and auxiliary devices. Data for malpractice claims arising from complications of endoscopic sedation are difficult to find.139 The Physician Insurers’ Association of America database, a large malpractice claims database, does not breakdown endoscopy-related claims into those that are procedure-related and those that are sedation-related.140 However,

Future Directions in Endoscopic Sedation

The benzodiazepines and opioid narcotics are the drug classes most widely used for endoscopic sedation within the United States.1 Although these agents produce effective sedation and analgesia for most patients, they lack the pharmacologic properties necessary to achieve optimal sedation during an endoscopic procedure. For example, the opioid analgesics are associated with troublesome side effects such as respiratory depression, bradycardia, nausea, and vomiting. Further, both fentanyl and

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (184)

  • J.P. Waring et al.

    Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • A.C. Chang et al.

    Impact of flumazenil on recovery after outpatient endoscopy: a placebo-controlled trial

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1999)
  • A. Kankaria et al.

    Flumazenil reversal of psychomotor impairment due to midazolam or diazepam for conscious sedation for upper endoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1996)
  • R.T. Wille et al.

    Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of flumazenil for routine outpatient EGD

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • T.G. Short et al.

    Hypnotic and anaesthetic interactions between midazolam, propofol and alfentanil

    Br J Anaesth

    (1992)
  • D.K. Rex et al.

    Trained registered nurses/endoscopy teams can administer propofol safely for endoscopy

    Gastroenterology

    (2005)
  • L.T. Heuss et al.

    Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients—a prospective, controlled study

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • M.F. Byrne et al.

    Nurse-assisted propofol sedation: the jury is in!

    Gastroenterology

    (2005)
  • D.K. Rex et al.

    Safety of propofol administered by registered nurses with gastroenterologist supervision in 2000 endoscopic cases

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • J.A. Walker et al.

    Nurse-administered propofol sedation without anesthesia specialists in 9152 endoscopic cases in an ambulatory surgery center

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2003)
  • L.T. Heuss et al.

    Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: a prospective observational study of more than 2000 cases

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • T. Wehrmann et al.

    Efficacy and safety of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP: a prospective, controlled study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1999)
  • L.B. Cohen et al.

    Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperidine/fentanyl, and midazolam

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2004)
  • G. Koshy et al.

    Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2000)
  • L.B. Cohen et al.

    Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • R. Rudner et al.

    Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2003)
  • J.J. Vargo et al.

    Gastroenterologist-administered propofol versus meperidine and midazolam for advanced upper endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial

    Gastroenterology

    (2002)
  • B.W. Sipe et al.

    Propofol versus midazolam/meperidine for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • B.J. Ulmer et al.

    Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2003)
  • G.A. Paspatis et al.

    Synergistic sedation with midazolam and propofol versus midazolam and pethidine in colonoscopies: a prospective, randomized study

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2002)
  • M.A. Qadeer et al.

    Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2005)
  • S.M. Green et al.

    Inadvertent ketamine overdose in children: clinical manifestations and outcome

    Ann Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • M.A. Gilger et al.

    Safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative agent for pediatric GI endoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2004)
  • A. Kirberg et al.

    Ketamine for pediatric endoscopic procedures and as a sedation complement for adult patients

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2005)
  • B.P. Saunders et al.

    Patient-administered nitrous oxide/oxygen inhalation provides effective sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1994)
  • G.M. Forbes et al.

    Nitrous oxide for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • S.K. Maslekar et al.

    Randomised controlled trial of sedation for colonoscopy: entonox versus intravenous sedation (abstr)

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2006)
  • M. Aho et al.

    Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam sedation and antagonism of dexmedetomidine with atipamezole

    J Clin Anesth

    (1993)
  • L.B. Cohen et al.

    Endoscopic sedation in the United States: results from a nationwide survey

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • L.T. Heuss et al.

    Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland

    Endoscopy

    (2005)
  • Y.Y. Huang et al.

    Conscious sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy

    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan

    (2005)
  • J.B. Gross et al.

    Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists

    Anesthesiology

    (2002)
  • R. Conigliaro et al.

    Implementation of sedation guidelines in clinical practice in Italy: results of a prospective longitudinal milticenter study

    Endoscopy

    (2006)
  • R. Pitetti et al.

    Effect on hospital-wide sedation practices after implementation of the 2001 JCAHO procedural sedation and analgesia guidelines

    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med

    (2006)
  • R.D. Dripps et al.

    The role of anesthesia in surgical mortality

    JAMA

    (1961)
  • M.A. Warner et al.

    Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologist Task Force on Preoperative Fasting

    Anesthesiology

    (1999)
  • O. Langeron et al.

    Prediction of difficult mask ventilation

    Anesthesiology

    (2000)
  • S.R. Mallampati et al.

    A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study

    Can Anaesth Soc J

    (1985)
  • L.R. Pasternak et al.

    Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on preanesthesia evaluation

    Anesthesiology

    (2002)
  • Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook of the JCAHO

    (2005)
  • Cited by (361)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This literature review and the recommendations therein were prepared for the AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee by the AGA Institute Sedation Subcommittee. The paper was approved by the Committee on April 26, 2007, and by the AGA Institute Governing Board on May 19, 2007.

    View full text