Elsevier

Journal of Infection

Volume 46, Issue 3, April 2003, Pages 180-185
Journal of Infection

Regular Article
Investigation of Tropical Eosinophilia; Assessing a Strategy Based on Geographical Area

https://doi.org/10.1053/jinf.2002.1108Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with eosinophilia are an important clinical problem. This study aimed to assess the most efficient manner of investigating patients with peripheral eosinophilia (eosinophil count >0.5×109 ml−1) presenting from the tropics.

Methods: Patients attending the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, from October 1997 to March 2002 for investigation of eosinophilia were identified prospectively. Laboratory, clinical and demographic data were recorded from laboratory and clinical records. An investigation set was proposed prospectively and assessed for all geographical areas (stool microscopy, strongyloides culture and serology), all of Africa (additional schistosomal serology, terminal urine microscopy and filarial serology) and West Africa (additional day-bloods for microfilaria).

Results: Data was analysed for 261 patients. At least one helminthic cause for eosinophilia was found in 64% of patients (median eosinophilia 1.2×109 ml−1). Seventeen per cent of patients had more than one helminth species found. Median eosinophilia increased with number of diagnoses per patient. The proposed investigation sets were validated, with high yield for all proposed tests apart from filarial serology outside West Africa, and good sensitivity.

Conclusions: Initial investigation of eosinophilia in patients presenting from the tropics may be guided by a simple investigation set depending on broad area of travel which has high sensitivity and yield. Patients frequently have more than one helminthic cause of eosinophilia.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (61)

  • Haematological Diseases in the Tropics

    2023, Manson's Tropical Diseases, Fourth Edition
  • The investigation of eosinophilia

    2018, Medicine (United Kingdom)
    Citation Excerpt :

    A considerable proportion (21–33%) of travellers and migrants with eosinophilia have no symptoms.1 The most common pathogens identified in this group are intestinal helminths, schistosomes, Strongyloides and Filaria.1 Schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis can have serious consequences, so it is important to investigate eosinophilia in returning travellers and migrants, even if it is asymptomatic.

  • The changing aetiology of eosinophilia in migrants and returning travellers in the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London 2002–2015: An observational study

    2017, Journal of Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Whilst numerous microbiological and serological tests are available, untargeted testing is time-consuming, expensive and frustrating.5 Many strategies have been suggested to rationalise the approach to patients with eosinophilia, including microscopy of multiple stool samples for ova, cysts and parasites (OCP), serological screening in selected patient groups,2,6,7 screening based on geographic area of travel3,5,8,9 and even empirical treatment amongst refugee populations.2,10–13 It is important to note that many of these approaches are based on studies of unselected groups of refugees or returning travellers, and thus may not have validity for focused investigation of eosinophilia in the wider populations.

View all citing articles on Scopus
f1

Please address all correspondence to: C. J. M. Whitty, Consultant Physician, The Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Mortimer Market, Capper Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK. Tel.: 02072994715; Fax: 0207299 4720; E-mail address:[email protected] (C. J. M. Whitty).

View full text