Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Updated June 2014

 

 Permissions and Reprints

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis.

Main recommendations

1 ESGE recommends routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before or after ERCP in all patients without contraindication. In addition to this, in the case of high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), the placement of a 5-Fr prophylactic pancreatic stent should be strongly considered. Sublingually administered glyceryl trinitrate or 250 µg somatostatin given in bolus injection might be considered as an option in high risk cases if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are contraindicated and if prophylactic pancreatic stenting is not possible or successful.

2 ESGE recommends keeping the number of cannulation attempts as low as possible.

3 ESGE suggests restricting the use of a pancreatic guidewire as a backup technique for biliary cannulation to cases with repeated inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct; if this method is used, deep biliary cannulation should be attempted using a guidewire rather than the contrast-assisted method and a prophylactic pancreatic stent should be placed.

4 ESGE suggests that needle-knife fistulotomy should be the preferred precut technique in patients with a bile duct dilated down to the papilla. Conventional precut and transpancreatic sphincterotomy present similar success and complication rates; if conventional precut is selected and pancreatic cannulation is easily obtained, ESGE suggests attempting to place a small-diameter (3-Fr or 5-Fr) pancreatic stent to guide the cut and leaving the pancreatic stent in place at the end of ERCP for a minimum of 12 – 24 hours.

4 ESGE does not recommend endoscopic papillary balloon dilation as an alternative to sphincterotomy in routine ERCP, but it may be advantageous in selected patients; if this technique is used, the duration of dilation should be longer than 1 minute.

• References

• 1 Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Devière J et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 503-515
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Dumonceau J-M, Rigaux J, Kahaleh M et al. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a practice survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 934-939 (e931–e932)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Kapral C, Mühlberger A, Wewalka F et al. Quality assessment of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a running nationwide Austrian benchmarking project after 5 years of implementation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1447-1454
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hanna MS, Portal AJ, Dhanda AD et al. UK wide survey on the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Frontline Gastroenterol 2014; 5: 103-110
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62: 102-111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Artifon EL, Chu A, Freeman M et al. A comparison of the consensus and clinical definitions of pancreatitis with a proposal to redefine post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas 2010; 39: 530-535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dellinger EP, Forsmark CE, Layer P et al. Determinant-based classification of acute pancreatitis severity: an international multidisciplinary consultation. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 875-880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Sutton VR, Hong MK, Thomas PR. Using the 4-hour post-ERCP amylase level to predict post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP 2011; 12: 372-376
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821-829
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Varadarajulu S, Kilgore ML, Wilcox CM et al. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 338-347
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Allison MC, Ramanaden DN, Fouweather MG et al. Provision of ERCP services and training in the United Kingdom. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 693-699
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Hilsden RJ, Romagnuolo J, May GR. Patterns of use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a Canadian province. Can J Gastroenterol 2004; 18: 619-624
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 793-801
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Swahn F, Nilsson M, Arnelo U et al. Rendezvous cannulation technique reduces post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective nationwide study of 12,718 ERCP procedures. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 552-559
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1753-1761
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-834
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-423
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 367-370
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Norton ID, Gostout CJ, Baron TH et al. Safety and outcome of endoscopic snare excision of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 239-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Kaffes AJ et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with post-ERCP pancreatitis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 266-271
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Cotton P, Garrow D, Gallagher J et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Wilcox CM, Phadnis M, Varadarajulu S. Biliary stent placement is associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 546-550
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Swan MP, Alexander S, Moss A et al. Needle knife sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 430-436 .e431
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Meister T, Heinzow H, Heinecke A et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis in 2364 ERCP procedures: is intraductal ultrasonography another risk factor?. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 331-336
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Gottlieb K, Sherman S, Pezzi J et al. Early recognition of post-ERCP pancreatitis by clinical assessment and serum pancreatic enzymes. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1553-1557
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Dai HF, Wang XW, Zhao K. Role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2009; 8: 11-16
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Elmunzer B, Waljee A, Elta G et al. A meta-analysis of rectal NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gut 2008; 57: 1262
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Zheng M-H, Xia H, Chen Y-P. Rectal administration of NSAIDs in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a complementary meta-analysis. Gut 2008; 57: 1632
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1414-1422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Dobronte Z, Toldy E, Mark L et al. [Effects of rectal indomethacin in the prevention of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis]. Orv Hetil 2012; 153: 990-996
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Otsuka T, Kawazoe S, Nakashita S et al. Low-dose rectal diclofenac for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 912-917
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Senol A, Saritas U, Demirkan H. Efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac and fluid replacement in prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 3999-4004
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Bhatia V, Ahuja V, Acharya SK et al. A randomized controlled trial of valdecoxib and glyceryl trinitrate for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 170-176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Ding X, Chen M, Huang S et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1152-1159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Yaghoobi M, Rolland S, Waschke KA et al. Meta-analysis: rectal indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 995-1001
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Sun HL, Han B, Zhai HP et al. Rectal NSAIDs for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgeon 2014; 12: 141-147
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Yuhara H, Ogawa M, Kawaguchi Y et al. Pharmacologic prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 388-399
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Sethi S, Sethi N, Wadhwa V et al. A meta-analysis on the role of rectal diclofenac and indomethacin in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas 2014; 43: 190-197
  Google Scholar
• 44 Elmunzer BJ, Higgins PD, Saini SD et al. Does rectal indomethacin eliminate the need for prophylactic pancreatic stent placement in patients undergoing high-risk ERCP? Post hoc efficacy and cost-benefit analyses using prospective clinical trial data. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108: 410-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Zhang Y, Chen QB, Gao ZY et al. Meta-analysis: octreotide prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis, but only at sufficient doses. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29: 1155-1164
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Omata F, Deshpande G, Tokuda Y et al. Meta-analysis: somatostatin or its long-acting analogue, octreotide, for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 885-895
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Katsinelos P, Fasoulas K, Paroutoglou G et al. Combination of diclofenac plus somatostatin in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 53-59
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Wang ZK, Yang YS, Cai FC et al. Is prophylactic somatostatin effective to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis or hyperamylasemia? A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013; 126: 2403-2408
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Andriulli A, Clemente R, Solmi L et al. Gabexate or somatostatin administration before ERCP in patients at high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 488-495
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Andriulli A, Solmi L, Loperfido S et al. Prophylaxis of ERCP-related pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial of somatostatin and gabexate mesylate. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 713-718
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Benvenutti S, Zancanella L, Piazzi L et al. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis with somatostatin versus gabexate mesylate: A randomized placebo controlled multicenter study. Dig Liv Dis 2006; 38: S15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Cavallini G, Tittobello A, Frulloni L et al. Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gabexate in digestive endoscopy - Italian Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 919-923
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Manes G, Ardizzone S, Lombardi G et al. Efficacy of postprocedure administration of gabexate mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 982-987
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Xiong GS, Wu SM, Zhang XW et al. Clinical trial of gabexate in the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Braz J Med Biol Res 2006; 39: 85-90
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Fujishiro H, Adachi K, Imaoka T et al. Ulinastatin shows preventive effect on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1065-1069
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Yoo JW, Ryu JK, Lee SH et al. Preventive effects of ulinastatin on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Pancreas 2008; 37: 366-370
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Tsujino T, Komatsu Y, Isayama H et al. Ulinastatin for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 376-383
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Ueki T, Otani K, Kawamoto K et al. Comparison between ulinastatin and gabexate mesylate for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized trial. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 161-167
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Chen S, Shi H, Zou X et al. Role of ulinastatin in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: the Emperor’s New Clothes or Aladdin’s Magic Lamp?. Pancreas 2010; 39: 1231-1237
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Seta T, Noguchi Y. Protease inhibitors for preventing complications associated with ERCP: an updated meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 700-706 (e1–e2)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Zhang ZF, Yang N, Zhao G et al. Preventive effect of ulinastatin and gabexate mesylate on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010; 123: 2600-2606
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Choi CW, Kang DH, Kim GH et al. Nafamostat mesylate in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: e11-e18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Park KT, Kang DH, Choi CW et al. Is high-dose nafamostat mesilate effective for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis, especially in high-risk patients?. Pancreas 2011; 40: 1215-1219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Yoo KS, Huh KR, Kim YJ et al. Nafamostat mesilate for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Pancreas 2011; 40: 181-186
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Shao L, Chen Q, Chen M et al. Nitroglycerin in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Bang UC, Nøjgaard C, Andersen PK et al. Meta-analysis: nitroglycerin for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 29: 1078-1085
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Gorelick A, Barnett J, Chey W et al. Botulinum toxin injection after biliary sphincterotomy. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 170-173
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Shimeno N et al. Epinephrine sprayed on the papilla for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 71-75
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Schwartz JJ, Lew RJ, Ahmad NA et al. The effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 179-184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Prat F, Amaris J, Ducot B et al. Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 202-208
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion 1993; 54: 105-111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Bai Y, Xu C, Yang X et al. Glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 690-695
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Ding J, Jin X, Pan Y et al. Glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and improve the rate of cannulation: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, controlled trials. PloS One 2013; 8: e75645
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Xu LH, Qian JB, Gu LG et al. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by epinephrine sprayed on the papilla. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 1139-1144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Akshintala VS, Hutfless SM, Colantuoni E et al. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: pharmacological prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 1325-1337
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Räty S, Sand J, Pulkkinen M et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: reduction by routine antibiotics. J Gastrointest Surg 2001; 5: 339-345 (discussion 345)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Wollschläger S, Pätzold K, Bulang T et al. [Effect of preventive selenium administration on development of ERCP-induced acute pancreatitis]. Med Klin (Munich) 1999; 94 (Suppl. 03) 81-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Niederau C, Pohlmann U, Lübke H et al. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment in therapeutic or complicated diagnostic ERCP: results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 533-537
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Alveyn CG, Robertson DA, Wright R et al. Prevention of sepsis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect 1991; 19 Suppl C 65-70
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Buxbaum J, Yan A, Yeh K et al. Aggressive hydration with lactated ringer’s solution reduces pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 303-307 (e301)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Sagi SV, Schmidt S, Fogel E et al. Association of greater intravenous volume infusion with shorter hospitalization for patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 1316-1320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 DiMagno MJ, Wamsteker E-J, Maratt J et al. Do larger periprocedural fluid volumes reduce the severity of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis?. Pancreas 2014; 43: 642-647
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Bai Y, Gao J, Shi X et al. Prophylactic corticosteroids do not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pancreatology 2008; 8: 504-509
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Zheng M, Bai J, Yuan B et al. Meta-analysis of prophylactic corticosteroid use in post-ERCP pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol 2008; 8: 6 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-8-6.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Sherman S, Cheng C-L, Costamagna G et al. Efficacy of recombinant human interleukin-10 in prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in subjects with increased risk. Pancreas 2009; 38: 267-274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Dumot JA, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G et al. A randomized, double blind study of interleukin 10 for the prevention of ERCP-induced pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2098-2102
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Devière J, Le Moine O, Van Laethem JL et al. Interleukin 10 reduces the incidence of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 498-505
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Barkay O, Niv E, Santo E et al. Low-dose heparin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1971-1976
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Rabenstein T, Fischer B, Wiessner V et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin does not prevent acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 606-613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Schwartz JJ, Lew RJ, Ahmad NA et al. The effect of lidocaine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla on the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 179-184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Prat F, Amaris J, Ducot B et al. Nifedipine for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 202-208
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Sand J, Nordback I. Prospective randomized trial of the effect of nifedipine on pancreatic irritation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion 1993; 54: 105-111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Andriulli A, Annese V. Risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and ways to prevent it: old myths, a current need? The case of allopurinol. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 374-376
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Bai Y, Gao J, Zhang W et al. Meta-analysis: allopurinol in the prevention of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 557-564
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G et al. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 105-111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Lavy A, Karban A, Suissa A et al. Natural beta-carotene for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pancreas 2004; 29: e45-e50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Milewski J, Rydzewska G, Degowska M et al. N-acetylcysteine does not prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 3751-3755
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Zheng M, Chen Y, Bai J et al. Meta-analysis of prophylactic allopurinol use in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Pancreas 2008; 37: 247-253
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 99 Li S, Cao G, Chen X et al. Low-dose heparin in the prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 477-481
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 100 Gu W-J, Wei C-Y, Yin R-X. Antioxidant supplementation for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr J 2013; 12: 23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 101 Abbasinazari M, Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Moshiri K et al. Does allopurinol prevent post endoscopic retrograde cholangio- pancreatography pancreatitis? A randomized double blind trial. Acta Med Iran 2011; 49: 579-583
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 102 Andriulli A, Forlano R, Napolitano G et al. Pancreatic duct stents in the prophylaxis of pancreatic damage after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic analysis of benefits and associated risks. Digestion 2007; 75: 156-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 103 Singh P, Das A, Isenberg G et al. Does prophylactic pancreatic stent placement reduce the risk of post-ERCP acute pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 544-550
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 104 Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T et al. Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1339-1346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 105 Das A, Singh P, Sivak MV et al. Pancreatic-stent placement for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 960-968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 106 Mazaki T, Mado K, Masuda H et al. Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement and post-ERCP pancreatitis: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 343-355
  Google Scholar
• 107 Akbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH et al. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 778-783
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 108 Afghani E, Akshintala VS, Khashab MA et al. 5-Fr vs. 3-Fr pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 173-80
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 109 Chahal P, Tarnasky PR, Petersen BT et al. Short 5Fr vs long 3Fr pancreatic stents in patients at risk for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 834-839
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 110 Zolotarevsky E, Fehmi SM, Anderson MA et al. Prophylactic 5-Fr pancreatic duct stents are superior to 3-Fr stents: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 325-330
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 111 Cha SW, Leung WD, Lehman GA et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy-associated pancreatitis? A randomized, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 209-216
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 112 Moffatt DC, Pradermchai K, Avula H et al. Moderate and severe postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis despite prophylactic pancreatic stent placement: the effect of early prophylactic pancreatic stent dislodgement. Can J Gastroenterol 2011; 25: 215-219
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 113 Rashdan A, Fogel EL, McHenry L et al. Improved stent characteristics for prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 322-329
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 114 Price LH, Brandabur JJ, Kozarek RA et al. Good stents gone bad: endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 174-179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 115 Halttunen J, Meisner S, Aabakken L et al. Difficult cannulation as defined by a prospective study of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 907 ERCPs. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 752-758
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 116 Wang P, Li Z-S, Liu F et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 31-40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 117 Wang B, Guo Z, Liu Z et al. Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 2454-2465
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 118 Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL et al. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 385-393
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 119 George S, Kulkarni AA, Stevens G et al. Role of osmolality of contrast media in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a metanalysis. Dig Dis Sci 2004; 49: 503-508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 120 Ogawa M, Kawaguchi Y, Kawashima Y et al. A comparison of ionic, monomer, high osmolar contrast media with non-ionic, dimer, iso-osmolar contrast media in ERCP. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2013; 38: 109-113
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 121 Cheng Y, Xiong X-Z, Wu S-J et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 5622-5631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 122 Shi H, Chen S, Swar G et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a review and meta-analysis. Pancreas 2013; 42: 1093-1100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 123 Wu J, Hu B. Carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013; 3: 37-42
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 124 Janssens F, Deviere J, Eisendrath P et al. Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: technique and practice survey. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1475-1479
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 125 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2343-2350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 126 Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan W-L et al. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1211-1219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 127 Lee TH, Park DH, Park J-Y et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 444-449
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 128 Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 362-372 (e361)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 129 Mariani A, Giussani A, Di Leo M et al. Guidewire biliary cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 339-346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 130 Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Afzali ES, Zafar Doagoo S et al. Preventive role of wire-guided cannulation to reduce hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Diagn Ther Endosc 2012; 2012: 821376
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 131 Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Imaizumi K et al. Wire-guided biliary cannulation technique does not reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: multicenter randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 295-302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 132 Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P et al. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 605-618
  Google Scholar
• 133 Rey JF, Beilenhoff U, Neumann CS et al. European Society of Gastrointest Endosc (ESGE) guideline: the use of electrosurgical units. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 764-772
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 134 Verma D, Kapadia A, Adler DG. Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 283-290
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 135 Dumonceau J-M, Deviere J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1998; 30: S80
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 136 Gyökeres T, Duhl J, Varsányi M et al. Double guide wire placement for endoscopic pancreaticobiliary procedures. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 95-96
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 137 Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 721-724
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 138 Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Diaz G et al. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 700-709
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 139 Xinopoulos D, Bassioukas SP, Kypreos D et al. Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1989-1995
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 140 Grönroos JM, Vihervaara H, Gullichsen R et al. Double-guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation: experiences from a single tertiary referral center. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1599-1602
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 141 Belverde B, Frattaroli S, Carbone A et al. Double guidewire technique for ERCP in difficult bile cannulation: experience with 121 cases. Ann Ital Chir 2012; 83: 391-393
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 142 Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W et al. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 356-361
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 143 Yoo YW, Cha S-W, Lee WC et al. Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 108-114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 144 Ito K, Horaguchi J, Fujita N et al. Clinical usefulness of double-guidewire technique for difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 442-449
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 145 Tanaka R, Itoi T, Sofuni A et al. Is the double-guidewire technique superior to the pancreatic duct guidewire technique in cases of pancreatic duct opacification?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 1787-1793
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 146 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y et al. Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic duct guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 1183-1191
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 147 Hisa T. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 5289
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 148 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 381-388
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 149 Gong B, Hao L, Bie L et al. Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2670-2680
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 150 Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 3286-3292
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 151 Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C. Safety and efficacy of precut needle-knife fistulotomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49: 759-765
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 152 Chan CHY, Brennan FN, Zimmerman MJ et al. Wire assisted transpancreatic septotomy, needle knife precut or both for difficult biliary access. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 1293-1297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 153 Wang P, Zhang W, Liu F et al. Success and complication rates of two precut techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy and needle-knife sphincterotomy for bile duct cannulation. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 697-704
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 154 Yasuda I, Tomita E, Enya M et al. Can endoscopic papillary balloon dilation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function?. Gut 2001; 49: 686-691
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 155 Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1455-1460
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 156 Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 18: CD004890
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 157 Liu Y, Su P, Lin S et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 464-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 158 Liao W-C, Tu Y-K, Wu M-S et al. Balloon dilation with adequate duration is safer than sphincterotomy for extracting bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1101-1109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 159 Liao W-C, Lee C-T, Chang C-Y et al. Randomized trial of 1-minute versus 5-minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1154-1162
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 160 Zhao H-C. Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 3883-3891
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 161 Natsui M, Saito Y, Abe S et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 313-321
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 162 Doi S, Yasuda I, Mukai T et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis. J Gastroenterol 2012; 48: 1090-1096
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 163 Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO et al. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 156-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 164 Attasaranya S, Cheon YK, Vittal H et al. Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal: a multicenter series. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 1046-1052
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 165 Maydeo A, Bhandari S. Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 958-961
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 166 Minami A, Hirose S, Nomoto T et al. Small sphincterotomy combined with papillary dilation with large balloon permits retrieval of large stones without mechanical lithotripsy. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 2179-2182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 167 Misra SP, Dwivedi M. Large-diameter balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 209-213
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 168 Heo JH, Kang DH, Jung HJ et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 720-726 ; quiz 768, 771
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 169 Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 655-663
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 170 Kim TH, Oh HJ, Lee JY et al. Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloon dilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones?. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3330-3337
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 171 Liu Y, Su P, Lin Y et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28: 937-945
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 172 Madhoun MF, Wani S, Hong S et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation reduces the need for mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagn Ther Endosc 2014; 2014: 1-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 173 Singh P, Gurudu SR, Davidoff S et al. Sphincter of Oddi manometry does not predispose to post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 499-505
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 174 Sherman S, Hawes RH, Troiano FP et al. Pancreatitis following bile duct sphincter of Oddi manometry: utility of the aspirating catheter. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 347-350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 175 Pfau PR, Banerjee S, Barth BA et al. Sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1175-1180
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 176 Saad AM, Fogel EL, McHenry L et al. Pancreatic duct stent placement prevents post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but normal manometry results. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 255-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 177 Kaffes AJ, Sriram PVJ, Rao GV et al. Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 669-674
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar