Virtual Reality Colonoscopy Simulation: A Compulsory Practice for the Future Colonoscopist?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aim: As for any manual procedure, the learning curves for medical interventions can have undesirable phases, occurring mostly in the early experience of applying a technique. There have been impressive advances in endoscopic procedures during recent years, and there is an emerging trend that the number of procedures is increasing in parallel with these. In addition, the introduction of screening programs for colorectal cancer will also increase the numbers of procedures needed. Recent developments in medical simulation seem promising with regard to the possibility of “training out” undesirable parts of the learning curve outside the operating room. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of the AccuTouch flexible endoscopy simulator improves the early part of the learning curve in colonoscopy training.
Method: 12 endoscopy trainees, 10 surgeons and two medical gastroenterologists, all with experience in gastroscopy but with no specific colonoscopy experience, were randomly assigned to either simulator training or to a control group. They all received the same theoretical study package and the training group practiced with the AccuTouch colonoscopy simulator until a predefined expert level of performance was reached. All trainees performed their first ten individual colonoscopies described in detail in a separate protocol.
Results: Trainees in the simulator-trained group performed significantly better (P = 0.0011) and managed to reach the cecum in 52 % of their cases (vs. 19 % in the control group), and were 4.53 times more likely to succeed compared with the controls. Additionally, there was a significantly shorter procedure time and less patient discomfort in the hands of the simulator-trained group.
Conclusion: Skills acquired using the AccuTouch simulator transfer well into the clinical colonoscopy environment. The results of this trial clearly support the plan to integrate simulator training into endoscopic education curricula.

References

• 1 Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L. et al . The impact of endoscopists’ experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 511-517
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Tassios P S, Ladas S D, Grammenos I. et al . Acquisition of competence in colonoscopy: the learning curve of trainees.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 702-706
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Church J, Oakley J, Milsom J. et al . Colonoscopy training: the need for patience (patients).  Aust NZ J Surg. 2002;  72 89-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Schwesinger W H, Levine B A, Ramos R. Complications in colonoscopy.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;  148 270-281
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Silvis S E, Nebel O, Rogers G. et al . Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey.  JAMA. 1976;  235 928-930
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rogers B H, Silvis S E, Nebel O T. et al . Complications of flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1975;  22 73-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Parry B R, Williams S M. Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1991;  61 419-422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Atkin W. Options for screening for colorectal cancer.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  Suppl (237) 13-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Bowles C JA, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al . A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.  Gut. 2004;  53 277-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Walsh J M, Terdiman J P. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review.  JAMA. 2003;  289 1288-1296
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Walsh J M, Terdiman J P. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications.  JAMA. 2003;  289 1297-1302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kohn L T, Corrigan J M, Donaldson M S (eds). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC; Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press 1999
  Google Scholar
• 13 Seymour N E, Gallagher A G, Roman S A. et al . Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.  Ann Surg. 2002;  236 458-463; discussion 463 - 464
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Datta V, Mandalia M, Mackay S. et al . The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Validation and early evaluation of a virtual reality based system.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 1459-1463
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ost D, DeRosiers A, Britt E J. et al . Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator.  Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2001;  164 2248-2255
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sedlack R E, Kolars J C. Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.  Acad Med. 2002;  77 750-751
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Williams C B, Baillie J, Gillies D F. et al . Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 49-54
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Williams C B, Saunders B P, Bladen J S. Development of colonoscopy teaching simulation.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 901-905
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Rey J F, Romanczyk T. The development of experimental models in the teaching of endoscopy: an overview.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 101-105
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Gessner C E, Jowell P S, Baillie J. Novel methods for endoscopic training.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;  5 323-336
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Adamsen S. Simulators and gastrointestinal endoscopy training.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 895-897
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hochberger J MJ, Hahn E G. The use of simulators for training in GI endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 727-729
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Neumann M HC, Horbach T. et al . Score card endoscopy: a multicenter study to evaluate learning curves in 1-week courses using the Erlangen Endo-trainer.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 515-520
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A. et al . Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 698-702
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar

G. Ahlberg, M. D., Ph. D.

Department of Surgery

Karolinska University Hospital · 17176 Stockholm · Sweden ·

Fax: +46-8-331587

Email: gunnar.ahlberg@karolinska.se