Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
At the heart of clinical and academic life is learning from experience. Frontline Gastroenterology takes pride in publishing material that highlights excellent clinical practice and identify ways in which it can be adopted. Academic discipline requires that published material is subject to scrutiny, and the best scrutiny comes from readers, more than journal reviewers. Perfectly delivered reader feedback serves the twin purpose of appreciating the quality of published manuscripts as well as improving the messages from those papers. We are delighted to include three thought-provoking letters, therefore, related to liver and luminal papers in recent editions. We would encourage you to please do the same with content in this copy of the journal. Equally, direct online participation and feedback is the core of the established programme of Frontline Gastroenterology Twitter debates, #FGDebate and follow @FrontGastro_BMJ—we look forward to hearing from you.
What's the score: risk assessment in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Adoption of risk stratification, by use of validated scores, is well recognised as critical to managing acute non-variceal …