Skip to main content
Log in

Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to determine if a normal small-bowel enteroclysis excludes small-bowel disease in adult patients, using long-term follow-up as the major reference standard. We reviewed 193 consecutive small-bowel enteroclysis (SBE) studies completed during a period from January 1987 to February 1989, of which 83 were judged to be normal at the time of the study. Eight of these latter patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. The indications included detection of gastrointestinal bleeding, small-bowel obstruction, Crohn's disease, nonspecific abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, and a miscellaneous group. Each patient was followed for at least 3 years by chart review or until a definite diagnosis was established. Six of the 75 patients whose SBE was originally interpreted as normal were eventually judged to have small-bowel disease. The remaining 69 patients were judged to be free of small-bowel disease by autopsy, surgical laparotomy, endoscopie observation or biopsy, or long-term follow-up for at least 3 years. Therefore, a normal SBE correctly excluded small-bowel disease in 69 of our 75 patients (true negatives) and failed to diagnose disease in six patients (false negatives), for a specificity of.92±.03 (SE). In this experience, SBE was sufficiently specific in most patients to exclude small-bowel disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H. Small bowel radiography: an overview. Dig Dis Sci 1984;29:1057–1059

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maglinte DDT, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM. Small bowel radiography: how, when and why? Radiology 1987;163:297–305

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barloon TJ, Franken EA. Plasma electrolyte status after small-bowel enteroclysis. AJR 1986;146:323–325

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H. Single contrast and biphasic enteroclysis. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DDT, eds. Clinical radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1989:107–118

    Google Scholar 

  5. McNemar Q. Psychological statistics (4th ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1969:52

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maglinte DDT, Peterson LA, Varey TN, et al. Enteroclysis in partial small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1984;147:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caroline DF, Herlinger H, Laufer I, et al. Small bowel enema in the diagnosis of adhesive obstructions. AJR 1984;142:1133 -1139

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekberg O. Crohn's disease of the small bowel examined by double contrast technique: a comparison with oral technique. Gastrointest Radiol 1977;1:355–359

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maglinte DDT, Elmore MF, Chenish SM, et al. Enteroclysis in the diagnosis of unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:403–405

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maglinte DDT, Chernish SM, Kelvin FM, O'Connor KW, Hage JP. Crohn's disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. Radiology 1992;184:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maglinte DDT, Burney BT, Miller RE. Lesions missed on small bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations. Radiology 1982;144:737–739

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ott DJ, Chen YM, Gelfand DW, et al. Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Radiology 1985;155:29–34

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barloon, T.J., Lu, C.C., Honda, H. et al. Does a normal small-bowel enteroclysis exclude small-bowel disease? a long-term follow-up of consecutive normal studies. Abdom Imaging 19, 113–115 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00203483

Key words

Navigation