Abstract
Background
There is increasing interest in the use of virtual-reality simulators in general surgery residency training. Many simulators lack a benchmark against which trainees can measure competence and skill.
Methods
Surgeons who had performed over 1,000 colonoscopies were evaluated on module 1, case 5 of the GI Mentor I or II™ virtual-reality endoscopy simulator (Simbionix, Cleveland). Participants were given 5 min to familiarize themselves with the simulator, and then performed the study case with standardized instructions. Metrics were recorded by using the previously calibrated simulator.
Results
Twenty-three surgeons (21 male, 2 female) participated. Mean height was 69.6 ± 2.6 inches, mean age 51 ± 9 years, median surgical glove size 7.5, and surgeons had 18.8 ± 10.1 years of practice, and did 8 ± 6 colonoscopies weekly. Ten participants had advanced training in endoscopy, laparoscopy or colorectal surgery; eight had used the simulator before, of whom six had used it once. Mean time to complete the study case was 13.6 ± 5.3 min and time to reach the cecum was 6.5 ± 4.3 min. Participants examined 92.3 ± 3.6% of the simulated colonic mucosa with a clear view of the lumen 89.5 ± 4.2% of the time. Total time the colon was looped was 22 ± 35 s (range 0–133 s). The overall efficiency of screening was 70.33 ± 23.45% (range 20–94%). Participants tended to mistake normal simulated colonic structures as pathology.
Conclusion
Performance on a virtual-reality endoscopic simulator has a wide amount of variability even among a group of experienced endoscopists. Expert benchmark tests should be performed on simulators that will be used for resident assessment prior to any attempts at certification of competence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Fraser SA, Stanbridge D, Ghitulescu G, Andrew CG (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–525
Dunkin BJ (2003) Flexible endoscopy simulator. Semin Laparosc Surg 10:29–35
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Jiwanji M, Bann S, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Validity and reliability of a virtual-reality upper gastrointestinal simulator and cross validation using structured assessment of individual performance with video playback. Surg Endosc 18:328–333
Clark JA, Volchok JA, Hazey JW, Sadighi PJ, Fanelli RD (2005) Initial experience using an endoscopic simulator to train surgical residents in flexible endoscopy in a community medical center residency program. Curr Surg 62:59–63
Lazar HL, DeLand EC, Tompkins RK (1980) Clinical performance versus in-training examinations as measures of surgical competence. Surgery 87:357–362
Borlase BC, Bartle EJ, Moore EE (1985) Does the in-training examination correlate with clinical performance in surgery? Curr Surg 42:290–292
Wade TP, Andrus CH, Kaminski DL (1993) Evaluations of surgery resident performance correlate with success in board examinations. Surgery 113:644–648
Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H, Rosen M, Fanning A, Dunkin BJ, Marks JM (2005) Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 189:497–500
Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A, Schillinger M, Haefner M, Gangl A, Schoefl R (2002) Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 34:698–702
Ritter EM, McClusky DA III, Lederman AB, Gallagher AG, Smith CD (2003) Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual-reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 7:871–877
Adamsen S, Funch-Jensen PM, Drewes AM, Rosenberg J, Grantcharov TP (2005) A comparative study of skills in virtual laparoscopy and endoscopy. Surg Endosc 19:229–234
Eversbusch A, Grantcharov TP (2004) Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual-reality endoscopy trainer. Surg Endosc 18:1514–1518
Grantcharov TP, Carstensen L, Schulze S (2005) Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual-reality simulator. JSLS 9(2):130–133
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phitayakorn, R., Marks, J.M., Reynolds, H.L. et al. Expert benchmark for the GI Mentor IITM . Surg Endosc 23, 611–614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0166-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0166-8