Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Z-line appearance and prevalence of intestinal metaplasia among patients without symptoms or endoscopical signs indicating gastroesophageal reflux

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A four-graded classification of the Z-line appearance (ZAP) has been proposed, which was shown to correlate with the prevalence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to determine the ZAP grade and the prevalence of IM among patients without GERD.

Methods

In this study, 53 consecutive patients without signs or symptoms of GERD were included.

Results

A normal Z-line (ZAP grade 0) was found in 26 patients (51%), and this group had a lower prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophy in the cardia than ZAP grade 1 patients. The non-GERD patients in this study had less ZAP pathology than the GERD patients in our previous study. Intestinal metaplasia at the Z-line, observed in 17% of the patients, was found to associate with peptic ulcer and carditis.

Conclusion

The normal Z-line is feasibly defined as ZAP grade 0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carton E, Mulligan ED, Keeling PW, Tanner A, McDonald G, Reynolds JV (2000) Specialized intestinal metaplasia: analysis of prevalence risk factors, and association with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 87: 362–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Mas CR, Kramer M, Seifert E, Rippin G, Vieth M, Stolte M (1999) Short Barrett: prevalence and risk factors. Scand J Gastroenterol 34: 1065–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DeNardi FG, Riddell RH (1991) The normal esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol 15: 296–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hameeteman W, Tytgat GN, Houthoff HJ, van dTJ (1989) Barrett’s esophagus: development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 96: 1249–1256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirota WK, Loughney TM, Lazas DJ, Maydonovitch CL, Rholl V, Wong RK (1999) Specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, and cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: prevalence and clinical data. Gastroenterology 116: 277–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA (1990) Symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lancet 335: 205–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nandurkar S, Talley NJ, Martin CJ, Ng TH, Adams S (1997) Shortsegment Barrett’s esophagus: prevalence, diagnosis, and associations. Gut 40: 710–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Price AB (1991) The Sydney System: histological division. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 209–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Richter JE (1998) Intestinal metaplasia and the squamocolumnar junction: what does it all mean? Gut 42: 604–605

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Riddell RH (1996) The biopsy diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease, “carditis,” and Barrett’s esophagus, and sequalae of therapy. Am J Surg Pathol 20: Suppl 1 S31-S51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sampliner RE (1998) Practice guidelines on the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 93: 1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Savary M, Miller G (1978) The esophagus: handbook and atlas of endoscopy. Gassmann, Solothurn Switzerland, pp

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spechler SJ (1997) The columnar lined esophagus: a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. Gut 41: 710–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spechler SJ, Goyal RK (1986) Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med 315: 362–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Voutilainen M, Farkkila M, Juhola M, Nuorva K, Mauranen K, Mantynen T, Kunnamo I, Mecklin JP, Sipponen P (1999) Specialized columnar epithelium of the esophagogastric junction: prevalence and associations. The Central Finland Endoscopy Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 94: 913–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Voutilainen M, Farkkila M, Mecklin JP, Juhola M, Sipponen P (2000) Classical Barrett esophagus contrasted with Barrett-type epithelium at normal-appearing esophagogastric junction. Central Finland Endoscopy Study Group. Scand J Gastroenterol 35: 2–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallner B, Sylvan A, Stenling R, Janunger KG (2000) The esophageal Z-line appearance correlates to the prevalence of intestinal metaplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 35: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Winters CJ, Spurling TJ, Chobanian SJ, Curtis DJ, Esposito RL, Hacker JF 3d, Johnson DA, Cruess DF, Cotelingam JD, Gurneg MS, Cattau EL, Jr. (1987) Barrett’s esophagus: a prevalent, occult complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 92: 118–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 2 May 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallner, B., Sylvan, A., Stenling, R. et al. The Z-line appearance and prevalence of intestinal metaplasia among patients without symptoms or endoscopical signs indicating gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc 15, 886–889 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090025

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640090025

Key words

Navigation